TCAAX vs. AABFX
TCAAX (Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund) and AABFX (Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Thrivent. Over the past 10 years, TCAAX returned 5.55%/yr vs 6.81%/yr for AABFX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TCAAX charges 0.82%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for AABFX.
Performance
TCAAX vs. AABFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCAAX achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly lower than AABFX's 5.70% return. Over the past 10 years, TCAAX has underperformed AABFX with an annualized return of 5.55%, while AABFX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.81% annualized return.
TCAAX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- 1Y
- 14.08%
- 3Y*
- 10.25%
- 5Y*
- 4.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.55%
AABFX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- 5.70%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 14.99%
- 3Y*
- 11.31%
- 5Y*
- 5.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
TCAAX vs. AABFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCAAX Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund | 5.12% | 11.66% | 8.27% | 11.69% | -14.96% | 6.52% | 10.12% | 14.81% | -3.89% | 7.26% |
AABFX Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund | 5.70% | 12.23% | 10.08% | 12.04% | -13.93% | 11.83% | 8.69% | 16.65% | -5.09% | 10.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCAAX and AABFX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006 | 0.95 |
The correlation between TCAAX and AABFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCAAX vs. AABFX — Risk / Return Rank
TCAAX
AABFX
TCAAX vs. AABFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund (TCAAX) and Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCAAX | AABFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 2.92 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.21 | 12.66 | -0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCAAX vs. AABFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCAAX drawdown since its inception was -30.82%, smaller than the maximum AABFX drawdown of -43.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAAX and AABFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCAAX | AABFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.82% | -43.44% | +12.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.04% | -5.13% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.47% | -7.04% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.33% | -21.56% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.33% | -27.40% | +7.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.13% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.79% | -5.63% | +1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 1.18% | -0.03% |
Volatility
TCAAX vs. AABFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund (TCAAX) is 2.63%, while Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that TCAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AABFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCAAX | AABFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 2.81% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.45% | 5.67% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.57% | 6.75% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.07% | 8.59% | -0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.23% | 9.34% | -2.11% |
TCAAX vs. AABFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCAAX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than AABFX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCAAX vs. AABFX - Dividend Comparison
TCAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, less than AABFX's 6.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AABFX Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund | 6.83% | 7.25% | 6.43% | 2.97% | 2.26% | 6.99% | 2.03% | 2.37% | 9.70% | 2.04% | 2.37% | 1.90% |
TCAAX Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund | 5.90% | 6.19% | 3.55% | 2.52% | 1.87% | 3.74% | 3.82% | 5.15% | 3.99% | 1.77% | 1.67% | 1.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, TCAAX and AABFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AABFX has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to TCAAX (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAAX dropped -30.82% vs AABFX's -43.44%.
AABFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCAAX and AABFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer