PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCAAX vs. TMAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCAAX vs. TMAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund (TCAAX) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAAX achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly lower than TMAAX's 8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, TCAAX has underperformed TMAAX with an annualized return of 5.50%, while TMAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.80% annualized return.


TCAAX

1D
0.07%
1M
2.02%
YTD
4.97%
6M
5.47%
1Y
14.61%
3Y*
10.70%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*
5.50%

TMAAX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.49%
YTD
8.70%
6M
9.46%
1Y
22.34%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAAX vs. TMAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCAAX
Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund
4.97%11.66%8.27%11.69%-14.96%6.52%10.12%14.81%-3.89%7.26%
TMAAX
Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A
8.70%15.13%19.29%17.06%-17.79%15.74%14.13%21.47%-6.30%11.50%

Correlation

The correlation between TCAAX and TMAAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.95

The correlation between TCAAX and TMAAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCAAX vs. TMAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAAX
TCAAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TCAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

TMAAX
TMAAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TMAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
TMAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCAAX vs. TMAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund (TCAAX) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCAAXTMAAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

2.28

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.50

3.19

+0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.42

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.02

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.07

13.45

-0.38

TCAAX vs. TMAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the TMAAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCAAX and TMAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCAAXTMAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.28

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.65

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.74

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.46

+0.14

Drawdowns

TCAAX vs. TMAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAAX drawdown since its inception was -30.82%, smaller than the maximum TMAAX drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAAX and TMAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCAAXTMAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.82%

-50.54%

+19.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.04%

-7.55%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.47%

-14.37%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.33%

-26.55%

+6.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.33%

-26.99%

+6.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-7.36%

+3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

1.69%

-0.56%

Volatility

TCAAX vs. TMAAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund (TCAAX) is 1.99%, while Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that TCAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCAAXTMAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

2.75%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.01%

7.86%

-2.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.22%

10.10%

-3.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.00%

13.88%

-5.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.20%

13.32%

-6.12%

TCAAX vs. TMAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAAX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than TMAAX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCAAX vs. TMAAX - Dividend Comparison

TCAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, less than TMAAX's 6.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TCAAX
Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund
5.91%6.19%3.55%2.52%1.87%3.74%3.82%5.15%3.99%1.77%1.67%1.51%
TMAAX
Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A
6.70%7.29%11.82%3.55%3.03%6.94%4.16%6.27%6.01%1.10%0.99%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, TCAAX and TMAAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TMAAX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to TCAAX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAAX dropped -30.82% vs TMAAX's -50.54%.

TCAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCAAX and TMAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer