TCAAX vs. TMAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund (TCAAX) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX).
TCAAX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 29, 2005. TMAAX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 30, 2005.
Performance
TCAAX vs. TMAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TCAAX vs. TMAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCAAX Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund | -2.44% | 11.66% | 8.27% | 11.69% | -14.96% | 6.52% | 10.12% | 14.81% | -3.89% | 7.26% |
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | -4.21% | 15.13% | 19.29% | 17.06% | -17.79% | 15.74% | 14.13% | 21.47% | -6.30% | 11.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCAAX achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly higher than TMAAX's -4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, TCAAX has underperformed TMAAX with an annualized return of 4.94%, while TMAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.73% annualized return.
TCAAX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -4.90%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -0.49%
- 1Y
- 8.76%
- 3Y*
- 8.22%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 4.94%
TMAAX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- 1Y
- 12.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TCAAX vs. TMAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCAAX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than TMAAX's 1.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TCAAX vs. TMAAX — Risk / Return Rank
TCAAX
TMAAX
TCAAX vs. TMAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund (TCAAX) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCAAX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 0.94 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 1.40 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.21 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 1.16 | +0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.34 | 5.41 | +0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCAAX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.94 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.53 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.66 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.42 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between TCAAX and TMAAX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TCAAX vs. TMAAX - Dividend Comparison
TCAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, less than TMAAX's 7.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCAAX Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund | 5.82% | 6.19% | 3.55% | 2.52% | 1.87% | 3.74% | 3.82% | 5.15% | 3.99% | 1.77% | 1.67% | 1.51% |
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | 7.61% | 7.29% | 11.82% | 3.55% | 3.03% | 6.94% | 4.16% | 6.27% | 6.01% | 1.10% | 0.99% | 0.76% |
Drawdowns
TCAAX vs. TMAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCAAX drawdown since its inception was -30.82%, smaller than the maximum TMAAX drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAAX and TMAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCAAX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.82% | -50.54% | +19.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.58% | -9.88% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.33% | -26.55% | +6.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.33% | -26.99% | +6.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.96% | -7.55% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -7.41% | +3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.33% | 2.12% | -0.79% |
Volatility
TCAAX vs. TMAAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund (TCAAX) is 2.67%, while Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that TCAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TCAAX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 4.06% | -1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.55% | 7.66% | -3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.69% | 13.98% | -6.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.92% | 13.81% | -5.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.14% | 13.28% | -6.14% |