PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMRC vs. NEO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TMRC vs. NEO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC) and Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TMRC is traded in USD, while NEO.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the NEO.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMRC achieves a 43.77% return, which is significantly lower than NEO.TO's 111.87% return.


TMRC

1D
-1.78%
1M
-15.38%
YTD
43.77%
6M
-3.24%
1Y
37.50%
3Y*
-2.09%
5Y*
-16.97%
10Y*
19.51%

NEO.TO

1D
4.38%
1M
2.29%
YTD
111.87%
6M
106.15%
1Y
173.66%
3Y*
61.23%
5Y*
13.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMRC vs. NEO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMRC
Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp
43.77%144.74%-41.84%-67.01%-33.83%11.30%43.90%397.98%17.62%40.00%
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials Inc.
111.87%110.98%1.80%-14.63%-54.01%50.44%19.13%-13.58%-18.83%4.85%

Correlation

The correlation between TMRC and NEO.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2017

0.09

Over the past year, TMRC and NEO.TO have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TMRC:

$71.96M

NEO.TO:

CA$1.40B

EPS

TMRC:

-$0.03

NEO.TO:

-$0.24

PB Ratio

TMRC:

16.86

NEO.TO:

2.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

TMRC:

$0.00

NEO.TO:

$511.45M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TMRC:

$0.00

NEO.TO:

$147.42M

EBITDA (TTM)

TMRC:

-$1.31M

NEO.TO:

$61.97M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMRC vs. NEO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMRC
TMRC Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TMRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMRC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TMRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMRC Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

NEO.TO
NEO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMRC vs. NEO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC) and Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMRCNEO.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.38

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

5.50

-5.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.68

11.09

-10.41

TMRC vs. NEO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMRC Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMRC and NEO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMRC vs. NEO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMRC drawdown since its inception was -95.42%, which is greater than NEO.TO's maximum drawdown of -74.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMRC and NEO.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMRCNEO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.42%

-74.57%

-20.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.33%

-31.80%

-45.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.33%

-38.53%

-44.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.57%

-74.57%

-17.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.83%

-7.12%

-73.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.95%

-37.05%

-16.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.57%

15.73%

+39.84%

Volatility

TMRC vs. NEO.TO - Volatility Comparison

Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC) has a higher volatility of 31.26% compared to Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) at 25.89%. This indicates that TMRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMRCNEO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.26%

25.89%

+5.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

88.45%

45.14%

+43.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

157.98%

64.38%

+93.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.30%

54.25%

+55.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.54%

53.18%

+56.36%

Dividends

TMRC vs. NEO.TO - Dividend Comparison

TMRC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials Inc.
1.19%2.57%5.01%5.24%4.17%1.97%2.90%3.20%2.47%
TMRC
Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TMRC vs. NEO.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp and Neo Performance Materials Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
152.42M
(TMRC) Total Revenue
(NEO.TO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TMRC and NEO.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMRC and NEO.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer