TMH vs. VCR
TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and VCR (Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return while VCR tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VCR.
Performance
TMH vs. VCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMH
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VCR
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 9.46%
- 3Y*
- 11.56%
- 5Y*
- 6.03%
- 10Y*
- 13.37%
TMH vs. VCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -2.25% |
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | -1.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMH and VCR is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMH vs. VCR — Risk / Return Rank
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VCR
TMH vs. VCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMH | VCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.10 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.61 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMH vs. VCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -10.32%, smaller than the maximum VCR drawdown of -61.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and VCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMH | VCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.32% | -61.54% | +51.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -3.31% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -9.37% | +3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.23% | — |
Volatility
TMH vs. VCR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMH | VCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.94% | 18.89% | +7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 24.14% | +1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 22.43% | +3.51% |
TMH vs. VCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VCR's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TMH vs. VCR - Dividend Comparison
TMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than VCR's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 4.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.72% | 0.74% | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.98% | 0.79% | 1.71% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMH and VCR have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for TMH.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 4.87%, compared with 0.72% for VCR.
TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while VCR tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.10% for VCR.
Find the right allocation for TMH and VCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer