VCR vs. VGT
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT).
VCR and VGT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VCR is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. VGT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both VCR and VGT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VCR or VGT.
Performance
VCR vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCR achieves a 18.75% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 25.23% return. Over the past 10 years, VCR has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 13.78%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 20.52% annualized return.
VCR
18.75%
6.46%
16.67%
29.90%
15.83%
13.78%
VGT
25.23%
0.64%
13.55%
33.20%
21.96%
20.52%
Key characteristics
| VCR | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.62 | 1.60 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.23 | 2.11 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.29 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.42 | 2.20 |
| Martin Ratio | 8.18 | 7.92 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.50% | 4.23% |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.73% | 20.99% |
| Max Drawdown | -61.54% | -54.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.91% | -3.62% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VCR vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VCR and VGT have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between VCR and VGT is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VCR vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VCR vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
VCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than VGT's 0.62% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.76% | 0.84% | 0.98% | 0.79% | 1.71% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 0.84% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.62% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% | 1.12% | 1.05% |
Drawdowns
VCR vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCR drawdown since its inception was -61.54%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCR and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VCR vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) have volatilities of 6.52% and 6.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.