TMH vs. RSPD
TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and RSPD (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return while RSPD tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.80, they often move in opposite directions. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPD.
Performance
TMH vs. RSPD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMH
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPD
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- -4.30%
- 6M
- -3.84%
- 1Y
- 5.27%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.97%
TMH vs. RSPD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -5.59% |
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | -1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMH and RSPD is -0.80, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMH vs. RSPD — Risk / Return Rank
TMH
RSPD
TMH vs. RSPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMH | RSPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -5.39 | 0.33 | -5.72 |
Drawdowns
TMH vs. RSPD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, smaller than the maximum RSPD drawdown of -68.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and RSPD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMH | RSPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.59% | -68.00% | +62.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.59% | -9.07% | +3.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -10.70% | +6.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.52% | — |
Volatility
TMH vs. RSPD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMH | RSPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.85% | 18.27% | +2.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 22.10% | -1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 23.11% | -2.26% |
TMH vs. RSPD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMH vs. RSPD - Dividend Comparison
TMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.03% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.09% | 0.99% | 0.53% | 0.81% | 1.59% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.27% | 1.37% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMH and RSPD have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPD.
RSPD has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for TMH.
TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while RSPD tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.40% for RSPD.
Find the right allocation for TMH and RSPD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer