PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMH vs. RSPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMH vs. RSPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TMH

1D
-0.03%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSPD

1D
-0.40%
1M
1.43%
YTD
-4.30%
6M
-3.84%
1Y
5.27%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
7.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMH vs. RSPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TMH and RSPD is -0.80, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMH vs. RSPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMH

RSPD
RSPD Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
RSPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPD Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPD Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMH vs. RSPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TMH vs. RSPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMHRSPDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-5.39

0.33

-5.72

Drawdowns

TMH vs. RSPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, smaller than the maximum RSPD drawdown of -68.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and RSPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMHRSPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-68.00%

+62.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.59%

-9.07%

+3.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-10.70%

+6.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.52%

Volatility

TMH vs. RSPD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMHRSPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.85%

18.27%

+2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.85%

22.10%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.85%

23.11%

-2.26%

TMH vs. RSPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMH vs. RSPD - Dividend Comparison

TMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
1.03%1.08%0.84%1.09%0.99%0.53%0.81%1.59%1.67%1.45%1.27%1.37%
TMH
Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMH and RSPD have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPD.

RSPD has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for TMH.

TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while RSPD tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.40% for RSPD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMH and RSPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer