TMH vs. RSPD
TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and RSPD (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return while RSPD tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. Both are passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPD.
Performance
TMH vs. RSPD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMH
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPD
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- 6M
- -5.03%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 1Y
- 4.27%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 4.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
TMH vs. RSPD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -2.25% |
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | 2.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMH and RSPD is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMH vs. RSPD — Risk / Return Rank
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSPD
TMH vs. RSPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMH | RSPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.05 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMH vs. RSPD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -10.32%, smaller than the maximum RSPD drawdown of -68.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and RSPD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMH | RSPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.32% | -68.00% | +57.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -5.71% | +2.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -10.68% | +4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.99% | — |
Volatility
TMH vs. RSPD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMH | RSPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.94% | 18.46% | +7.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 22.17% | +3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 23.08% | +2.86% |
TMH vs. RSPD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMH vs. RSPD - Dividend Comparison
TMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than RSPD's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.87% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.09% | 0.99% | 0.53% | 0.81% | 1.59% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.27% | 1.37% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 4.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMH and RSPD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPD.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 4.87%, compared with 0.87% for RSPD.
TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while RSPD tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.40% for RSPD.
Find the right allocation for TMH and RSPD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer