PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RSPD vs. FDIS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RSPD and FDIS is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

RSPD vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
9.27%
13.80%
RSPD
FDIS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RSPD:

0.90

FDIS:

1.14

Sortino Ratio

RSPD:

1.31

FDIS:

1.61

Omega Ratio

RSPD:

1.16

FDIS:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

RSPD:

1.08

FDIS:

1.34

Martin Ratio

RSPD:

3.23

FDIS:

5.49

Ulcer Index

RSPD:

4.41%

FDIS:

3.88%

Daily Std Dev

RSPD:

15.80%

FDIS:

18.67%

Max Drawdown

RSPD:

-68.00%

FDIS:

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

RSPD:

-3.59%

FDIS:

-8.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPD achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly higher than FDIS's -2.60% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPD has underperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 7.22%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.21% annualized return.


RSPD

YTD

1.09%

1M

-0.44%

6M

9.27%

1Y

12.31%

5Y*

9.25%

10Y*

7.22%

FDIS

YTD

-2.60%

1M

-5.65%

6M

13.80%

1Y

18.47%

5Y*

14.02%

10Y*

13.21%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSPD vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio.


RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
Expense ratio chart for RSPD: current value at 0.40% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.40%
Expense ratio chart for FDIS: current value at 0.08% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.08%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RSPD vs. FDIS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RSPD is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RSPD is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RSPD is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RSPD is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RSPD is 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RSPD is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDIS is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDIS is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDIS is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDIS is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDIS is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDIS is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RSPD vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RSPD, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.901.14
The chart of Sortino ratio for RSPD, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.311.61
The chart of Omega ratio for RSPD, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.161.20
The chart of Calmar ratio for RSPD, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.081.34
The chart of Martin ratio for RSPD, currently valued at 3.23, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.235.49
RSPD
FDIS

The current RSPD Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the FDIS Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPD and FDIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.90
1.14
RSPD
FDIS

Dividends

RSPD vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison

RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than FDIS's 0.71% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.83%0.84%1.09%1.00%0.53%0.81%1.59%1.67%1.45%1.27%1.37%1.05%
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.71%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%1.01%

Drawdowns

RSPD vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPD drawdown since its inception was -68.00%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPD and FDIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-3.59%
-8.77%
RSPD
FDIS

Volatility

RSPD vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) is 4.69%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that RSPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.69%
5.09%
RSPD
FDIS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab