PortfoliosLab logo
RSPD vs. FDIS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RSPD and FDIS is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

RSPD vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%300.00%350.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
123.06%
275.47%
RSPD
FDIS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RSPD:

0.16

FDIS:

0.41

Sortino Ratio

RSPD:

0.38

FDIS:

0.75

Omega Ratio

RSPD:

1.05

FDIS:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

RSPD:

0.16

FDIS:

0.38

Martin Ratio

RSPD:

0.60

FDIS:

1.21

Ulcer Index

RSPD:

5.63%

FDIS:

8.55%

Daily Std Dev

RSPD:

21.71%

FDIS:

25.61%

Max Drawdown

RSPD:

-68.00%

FDIS:

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

RSPD:

-12.65%

FDIS:

-18.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPD achieves a -8.41% return, which is significantly higher than FDIS's -12.90% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPD has underperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 6.38%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.


RSPD

YTD

-8.41%

1M

-1.55%

6M

-5.47%

1Y

2.65%

5Y*

13.49%

10Y*

6.38%

FDIS

YTD

-12.90%

1M

0.09%

6M

-3.41%

1Y

8.72%

5Y*

14.49%

10Y*

12.00%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSPD vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for RSPD: current value is 0.40%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
RSPD: 0.40%
Expense ratio chart for FDIS: current value is 0.08%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FDIS: 0.08%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RSPD vs. FDIS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RSPD is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RSPD is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RSPD is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RSPD is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RSPD is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RSPD is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDIS is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDIS is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDIS is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDIS is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDIS is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDIS is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RSPD vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for RSPD, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
RSPD: 0.16
FDIS: 0.41
The chart of Sortino ratio for RSPD, currently valued at 0.38, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
RSPD: 0.38
FDIS: 0.75
The chart of Omega ratio for RSPD, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
RSPD: 1.05
FDIS: 1.10
The chart of Calmar ratio for RSPD, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
RSPD: 0.16
FDIS: 0.38
The chart of Martin ratio for RSPD, currently valued at 0.60, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
RSPD: 0.60
FDIS: 1.21

The current RSPD Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the FDIS Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPD and FDIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.16
0.41
RSPD
FDIS

Dividends

RSPD vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison

RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than FDIS's 0.85% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
1.02%0.84%1.09%1.00%0.53%0.81%1.59%1.67%1.45%1.27%1.37%1.05%
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.85%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%1.01%

Drawdowns

RSPD vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPD drawdown since its inception was -68.00%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPD and FDIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-12.65%
-18.42%
RSPD
FDIS

Volatility

RSPD vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) is 14.67%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that RSPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.67%
16.30%
RSPD
FDIS