PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMH vs. ONLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMH vs. ONLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TMH

1D
-0.03%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ONLN

1D
-2.12%
1M
-7.61%
YTD
-6.45%
6M
-7.82%
1Y
12.40%
3Y*
21.88%
5Y*
-6.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMH vs. ONLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TMH and ONLN is -0.80, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMH vs. ONLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMH

ONLN
ONLN Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ONLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONLN Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ONLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONLN Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMH vs. ONLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TMH vs. ONLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMHONLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-5.39

0.14

-5.53

Drawdowns

TMH vs. ONLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, smaller than the maximum ONLN drawdown of -71.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and ONLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMHONLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-71.77%

+66.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.59%

-39.42%

+33.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-35.43%

+31.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.73%

Volatility

TMH vs. ONLN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMHONLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.85%

23.75%

-2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.85%

33.04%

-12.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.85%

32.10%

-11.25%

TMH vs. ONLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ONLN's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMH vs. ONLN - Dividend Comparison

TMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ONLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
0.35%0.30%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.24%
TMH
Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMH and ONLN have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for ONLN.

ONLN has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for TMH.

TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while ONLN tracks ProShares Online Retail Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.58% for ONLN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMH and ONLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer