ONLN vs. CHIQ
ONLN (ProShares Online Retail ETF) and CHIQ (Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ONLN is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the ProShares Online Retail Index, while CHIQ is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ONLN returned -3.67%/yr vs -7.60%/yr for CHIQ. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ONLN charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CHIQ.
Performance
ONLN vs. CHIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONLN achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly higher than CHIQ's -11.44% return.
ONLN
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 6.50%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 12.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.67%
- 5Y*
- -3.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.36%
CHIQ
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 14.99%
- 6M
- -10.92%
- YTD
- -11.44%
- 1Y
- -9.18%
- 3Y*
- -1.44%
- 5Y*
- -7.60%
- 10Y*
- 6.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.00M | $788.69K | $799.61K | |
| $490.13K | $484.04K | $423.49K |
ONLN vs. CHIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | 0.64% | 33.03% | 24.85% | 27.37% | -50.07% | -25.22% | 111.82% | 19.93% | -24.66% |
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | -11.44% | 13.69% | 10.74% | -10.70% | -22.01% | -27.07% | 92.61% | 44.19% | -24.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONLN and CHIQ is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2018 | 0.63 |
The correlation between ONLN and CHIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ONLN vs. CHIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ONLN
CHIQ
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ONLN
CHIQ
Technology
ONLN
CHIQ
Consumer Defensive
ONLN
CHIQ
Basic Materials
ONLN
-
CHIQ
-
Communication Services
ONLN
-
CHIQ
-
Energy
ONLN
-
CHIQ
-
Financial Services
ONLN
-
CHIQ
-
Healthcare
ONLN
-
CHIQ
-
Industrials
ONLN
-
CHIQ
Real Estate
ONLN
-
CHIQ
Utilities
ONLN
-
CHIQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONLN vs. CHIQ — Risk / Return Rank
ONLN
CHIQ
ONLN vs. CHIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) and Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONLN | CHIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.95 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | -0.29 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | -0.61 | +1.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONLN vs. CHIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONLN drawdown since its inception was -71.77%, which is greater than CHIQ's maximum drawdown of -67.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONLN and CHIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONLN | CHIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.77% | -67.04% | -4.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.75% | -35.53% | +15.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.97% | -35.53% | +7.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.49% | -54.89% | -9.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.84% | -53.54% | +18.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.48% | -30.86% | -4.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.13% | 16.72% | -7.59% |
Volatility
ONLN vs. CHIQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) at 6.67%. This indicates that ONLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONLN | CHIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 6.67% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.40% | 16.80% | +2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.42% | 23.20% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.00% | 37.29% | -4.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.01% | 32.46% | -0.45% |
ONLN vs. CHIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONLN has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than CHIQ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ONLN vs. CHIQ - Dividend Comparison
ONLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than CHIQ's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.52% | 1.48% | 2.65% | 2.26% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.05% | 2.71% | 0.62% | 1.51% | 4.86% |
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | 0.28% | 0.30% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONLN and CHIQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONLN has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to CHIQ (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONLN dropped -71.77% vs CHIQ's -67.04%.
On 5-year performance, ONLN leads with -3.67% vs -7.60% for CHIQ. On fees, ONLN is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, CHIQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ONLN has performed better with a -3.67% return vs -7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONLN is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CHIQ.
CHIQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.28% for ONLN.
ONLN is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while CHIQ is China Equities. ONLN tracks ProShares Online Retail Index, while CHIQ tracks MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for ONLN and 0.65% for CHIQ.
ONLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ONLN and CHIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer