TMH vs. IBIC
TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMH is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
TMH vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMH
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 4.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMH vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -9.14% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMH and IBIC is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMH vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBIC
TMH vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMH | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 16.49 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 57.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMH vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMH | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -0.90% | -9.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.63% | -0.17% | -9.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -0.10% | -5.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.08% | — |
Volatility
TMH vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMH | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.57% | 0.90% | +24.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.57% | 1.56% | +24.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.57% | 1.56% | +24.01% |
TMH vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TMH vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
TMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 5.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMH and IBIC have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for TMH.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.
TMH is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.10% for IBIC.
Find the right allocation for TMH and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer