PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMH vs. GXPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMH vs. GXPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TMH

1D
-0.03%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GXPD

1D
-0.87%
1M
-2.13%
YTD
-0.87%
6M
-0.98%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMH vs. GXPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TMH and GXPD is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMH vs. GXPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TMH vs. GXPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMHGXPDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-5.39

0.26

-5.66

Drawdowns

TMH vs. GXPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, smaller than the maximum GXPD drawdown of -16.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and GXPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMHGXPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-16.61%

+11.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.59%

-5.48%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-4.27%

+0.05%

Volatility

TMH vs. GXPD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMHGXPDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.85%

20.01%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.85%

20.01%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.85%

20.01%

+0.84%

TMH vs. GXPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPD's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TMH vs. GXPD - Dividend Comparison

TMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TMH and GXPD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for TMH.

GXPD has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.00% for TMH.

TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while GXPD tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.15% for GXPD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMH and GXPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer