TMH vs. GSKH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and GSKH (GSK plc ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMH is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while GSKH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the GSK plc Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.

Performance

TMH vs. GSKH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TMH

• 1D: -1.80%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GSKH

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: 2.94%
• YTD: 9.90%
• 6M: 10.56%
• 1Y: 42.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMH vs. GSKH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged	-9.71%
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF	2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between TMH and GSKH is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	-0.18

Return for Risk

TMH vs. GSKH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GSKH

GSKH Risk / Return Rank: 51
GSKH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
GSKH Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
GSKH Omega Ratio Rank: 54
GSKH Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
GSKH Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMH vs. GSKH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMH	GSKH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.64	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.43	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.31	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.06	—

Drawdowns

TMH vs. GSKH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum GSKH drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and GSKH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMH	GSKH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.20%	-18.54%	+8.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.20%	-11.62%	+1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.78%	-5.86%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TMH	GSKH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.89%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.67%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.94%	26.14%	-0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.94%	26.95%	-1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.94%	26.95%	-1.01%

TMH vs. GSKH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TMH and GSKH have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TMH vs. GSKH - Dividend Comparison

TMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than GSKH's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF	2.82%	1.15%
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged	5.28%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMH and GSKH in my portfolio?

TMH and GSKH have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TMH or GSKH?

Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMH or GSKH?

TMH and GSKH have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMH or GSKH?

TMH has the higher dividend yield at 5.28%, compared with 2.82% for GSKH.

What is the main difference between TMH and GSKH?

TMH is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while GSKH is Health & Biotech Equities. TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while GSKH tracks GSK plc Local Shares Total Return.