GSKH vs. ARKG

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

GSKH (GSK plc ADRhedged ETF) and ARKG (ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. GSKH is passively managed, while ARKG is actively managed. Over the past year, GSKH returned 30.78% vs 50.09% for ARKG. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSKH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKG.

Performance

GSKH vs. ARKG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSKH achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly lower than ARKG's 15.33% return.

GSKH

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 4.57%
• YTD: 7.84%
• 6M: 8.19%
• 1Y: 30.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARKG

• 1D: -7.89%
• 1M: 7.57%
• YTD: 15.33%
• 6M: 8.02%
• 1Y: 50.09%
• 3Y*: -0.83%
• 5Y*: -15.98%
• 10Y*: 6.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSKH vs. ARKG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF	7.84%	37.05%
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF	15.33%	13.21%

Correlation

The correlation between GSKH and ARKG is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2025	0.17

GSKH vs. ARKG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GSKH	ARKG
Healthcare	100.0%	99.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.5%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GSKH vs. ARKG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSKH

GSKH Risk / Return Rank: 36
GSKH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
GSKH Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
GSKH Omega Ratio Rank: 38
GSKH Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
GSKH Martin Ratio Rank: 30

ARKG

ARKG Risk / Return Rank: 34
ARKG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
ARKG Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
ARKG Omega Ratio Rank: 32
ARKG Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ARKG Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSKH vs. ARKG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSKH	ARKG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	1.19	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	1.84	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.21	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	1.83	-0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.06	4.38	-0.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSKH vs. ARKG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSKH Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the ARKG Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSKH and ARKG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSKH	ARKG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	1.19	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.19	0.13	+1.06

Drawdowns

GSKH vs. ARKG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSKH drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, smaller than the maximum ARKG drawdown of -83.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSKH and ARKG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSKH	ARKG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.54%	-83.59%	+65.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.54%	-27.51%	+8.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-51.96%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-80.18%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-83.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.28%	-70.11%	+56.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.65%	-35.90%	+30.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.61%	11.47%	-3.86%

Volatility

GSKH vs. ARKG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH) is 6.33%, while ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) has a volatility of 15.38%. This indicates that GSKH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSKH	ARKG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.33%	15.38%	-9.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.35%	30.47%	-12.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.30%	42.35%	-16.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.08%	45.83%	-18.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.08%	41.24%	-14.16%

GSKH vs. ARKG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSKH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSKH vs. ARKG - Dividend Comparison

GSKH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, while ARKG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.62%	0.85%	3.14%	0.82%	1.34%
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF	1.57%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSKH and ARKG in my portfolio?

GSKH and ARKG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSKH or ARKG?

ARKG has higher volatility (15.38%) compared to GSKH (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSKH dropped -18.54% vs ARKG's -83.59%.

Which ETF is better, GSKH or ARKG?

On 1-year performance, ARKG leads with 50.09% vs 30.78% for GSKH. On fees, GSKH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, GSKH has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GSKH or ARKG?

Over the 1-year period, ARKG has performed better with a 50.09% return vs 30.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSKH or ARKG?

GSKH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSKH or ARKG?

GSKH has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.00% for ARKG.

What is the main difference between GSKH and ARKG?

They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for GSKH and 0.75% for ARKG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARKG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.