TMFS vs. BBMC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TMFS (Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF) and BBMC (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. TMFS is actively managed, while BBMC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TMFS returned -1.68%/yr vs 8.32%/yr for BBMC. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMFS charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for BBMC.

Performance

TMFS vs. BBMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFS achieves a -4.69% return, which is significantly lower than BBMC's 16.66% return.

TMFS

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: -3.92%
• YTD: -4.69%
• 6M: -6.04%
• 1Y: -3.97%
• 3Y*: 6.32%
• 5Y*: -1.68%
• 10Y*: —

BBMC

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 4.96%
• YTD: 16.66%
• 6M: 16.84%
• 1Y: 33.04%
• 3Y*: 19.56%
• 5Y*: 8.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFS vs. BBMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF	-4.69%	-1.59%	15.41%	25.40%	-33.15%	-2.38%	80.86%
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	16.66%	12.24%	15.15%	18.37%	-19.77%	17.64%	61.98%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFS and BBMC is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020	0.88

The correlation between TMFS and BBMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

TMFS vs. BBMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TMFS	BBMC
Technology	26.6%	21.6%
Industrials	23.8%	18.6%
Healthcare	20.9%	10.0%
Financial Services	13.1%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	11.5%
Real Estate	5.2%	6.3%
Basic Materials	2.4%	4.9%
Energy	2.4%	3.1%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	3.5%
Communication Services	-	2.4%
Utilities	-	2.6%

Return for Risk

TMFS vs. BBMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFS

TMFS Risk / Return Rank: 6
TMFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
TMFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
TMFS Omega Ratio Rank: 6
TMFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
TMFS Martin Ratio Rank: 6

BBMC

BBMC Risk / Return Rank: 63
BBMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BBMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
BBMC Omega Ratio Rank: 56
BBMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BBMC Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFS vs. BBMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TMFS	BBMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.20	2.04	-2.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.16	2.86	-3.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.35	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.25	3.41	-3.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.70	13.41	-14.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TMFS vs. BBMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFS Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the BBMC Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFS and BBMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMFS	BBMC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20	2.04	-2.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07	0.41	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.85	-0.53

Drawdowns

TMFS vs. BBMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFS drawdown since its inception was -48.79%, which is greater than BBMC's maximum drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFS and BBMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMFS	BBMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.79%	-30.11%	-18.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.73%	-9.75%	-5.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.05%	-24.18%	-2.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.68%	-30.11%	-15.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.78%	-0.12%	-22.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.47%	-8.92%	-10.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.68%	2.47%	+3.21%

Volatility

TMFS vs. BBMC - Volatility Comparison

Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) at 4.72%. This indicates that TMFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMFS	BBMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	4.72%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.98%	12.14%	+1.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.62%	16.32%	+3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.93%	20.59%	+2.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.52%	21.08%	+4.44%

TMFS vs. BBMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFS has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BBMC's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMFS vs. BBMC - Dividend Comparison

TMFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.09%	1.25%	1.31%	1.36%	1.48%	0.87%	0.69%	0.00%
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.34%	2.37%	5.57%	2.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMFS and BBMC in my portfolio?

TMFS and BBMC have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMFS or BBMC?

TMFS has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to BBMC (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFS dropped -48.79% vs BBMC's -30.11%.

Which ETF is better, TMFS or BBMC?

On 5-year performance, BBMC leads with 8.32% vs -1.68% for TMFS. On fees, BBMC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BBMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TMFS or BBMC?

Over the 5-year period, BBMC has performed better with a 8.32% return vs -1.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMFS or BBMC?

BBMC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMFS or BBMC?

BBMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.00% for TMFS.

What is the main difference between TMFS and BBMC?

They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFS and 0.07% for BBMC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.