BBMC vs. VOT
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT).
BBMC and VOT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBMC is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan Chase that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. It was launched on Apr 14, 2020. VOT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Mid Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Aug 17, 2006. Both BBMC and VOT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BBMC or VOT.
Correlation
The correlation between BBMC and VOT is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BBMC vs. VOT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BBMC:
0.99
VOT:
1.24
BBMC:
1.45
VOT:
1.71
BBMC:
1.18
VOT:
1.22
BBMC:
1.25
VOT:
0.99
BBMC:
5.06
VOT:
7.24
BBMC:
3.32%
VOT:
2.58%
BBMC:
16.91%
VOT:
15.12%
BBMC:
-30.11%
VOT:
-60.17%
BBMC:
-8.10%
VOT:
-6.98%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBMC achieves a 14.84% return, which is significantly lower than VOT's 17.05% return.
BBMC
14.84%
-2.98%
10.33%
15.15%
N/A
N/A
VOT
17.05%
-1.21%
10.73%
17.75%
10.78%
10.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBMC vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BBMC and VOT have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BBMC vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BBMC vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison
BBMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than VOT's 0.69% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 0.75% | 1.36% | 1.48% | 0.87% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.69% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% | 0.79% | 0.61% |
Drawdowns
BBMC vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBMC drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBMC and VOT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BBMC vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) have volatilities of 5.54% and 5.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.