PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TMFC vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TMFC vs. EINC

Last updated Jul 12, 2026
Documentation

TMFC (Motley Fool 100 Index ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool 100 Index, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TMFC returned 14.18%/yr vs 21.31%/yr for EINC. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMFC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

TMFC vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFC achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 26.77% return.

TMFC

1D
0.41%
1M
2.91%
6M
7.27%
YTD
8.36%
1Y
20.88%
3Y*
24.61%
5Y*
14.18%
10Y*
—

EINC

1D
0.19%
1M
0.31%
6M
28.45%
YTD
26.77%
1Y
30.66%
3Y*
28.13%
5Y*
21.31%
10Y*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFC vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF		8.36%19.55%35.17%47.04%-30.86%25.30%42.00%34.70%-5.85%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		26.77%7.11%42.79%15.55%19.18%38.05%-19.89%16.98%-24.84%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFC and EINC is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2018

0.31

The correlation between TMFC and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TMFC vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TMFC
EINC

Technology

44.5%

-

Communication Services

16.6%

-

Financial Services

12.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%

-

Healthcare

4.4%

-

Industrials

4.0%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%

-

Energy

1.7%
99.4%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Basic Materials

0.6%

-

Utilities

0.4%
0.6%

Technology

TMFC
44.5%
EINC

-

Communication Services

TMFC
16.6%
EINC

-

Financial Services

TMFC
12.1%
EINC

-

Consumer Cyclical

TMFC
11.1%
EINC

-

Healthcare

TMFC
4.4%
EINC

-

Industrials

TMFC
4.0%
EINC
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

TMFC
3.8%
EINC

-

Energy

TMFC
1.7%
EINC
99.4%

Real Estate

TMFC
0.9%
EINC

-

Basic Materials

TMFC
0.6%
EINC

-

Utilities

TMFC
0.4%
EINC
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Motley Fool 100 Index ETF

VanEck Energy Income ETF

Often compared with TMFC:
TMFC vs. SPYTMFC vs. QQQTMFC vs. VOOTMFC vs. TMFXTMFC vs. TMFETMFC vs. QQQMTMFC vs. SCHG
Often compared with EINC:
EINC vs. XLEEINC vs. BIZDEINC vs. EMLPEINC vs. SMHEINC vs. IXCEINC vs. VPUEINC vs. ERY

Return for Risk

TMFC vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TMFC
TMFC Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFC vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TMFCEINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.44
2.05

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.00
2.78

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

3.98

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.72

9.80

-4.07

TMFC vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFC Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFC and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMFC vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFC drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFC and EINC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TMFCEINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.06%

-87.55%

+54.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.64%

-7.89%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.06%

-16.01%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.06%

-19.87%

-13.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-68.85%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-3.89%

+2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-44.02%

+37.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

3.20%

+0.38%

Volatility

TMFC vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) is 5.19%, while VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that TMFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TMFCEINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

6.16%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

12.26%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.29%

15.33%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.50%

19.58%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.96%

25.33%

-3.37%

TMFC vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMFC vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

TMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than EINC's 3.49% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		3.49%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF		0.13%0.14%0.40%0.26%0.27%0.23%0.42%0.50%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

TMFC and EINC have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EINC has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to TMFC (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFC dropped -33.06% vs EINC's -87.55%.

On 5-year performance, EINC leads with 21.31% vs 14.18% for TMFC. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, TMFC has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EINC has performed better with a 21.31% return vs 14.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TMFC.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.13% for TMFC.

TMFC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. TMFC tracks Motley Fool 100 Index, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMFC and 0.45% for EINC.

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMFC and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer