TMF vs. SOXS
TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) and SOXS (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while SOXS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TMF returned -16.47%/yr vs -79.49%/yr for SOXS. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMF charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SOXS.
Performance
TMF vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMF achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly higher than SOXS's -93.36% return. Over the past 10 years, TMF has outperformed SOXS with an annualized return of -16.47%, while SOXS has yielded a comparatively lower -79.49% annualized return.
TMF
- 1D
- 3.90%
- 1M
- 10.18%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 6M
- -2.86%
- 1Y
- -0.04%
- 3Y*
- -19.78%
- 5Y*
- -30.25%
- 10Y*
- -16.47%
SOXS
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -46.60%
- YTD
- -93.36%
- 6M
- -93.05%
- 1Y
- -97.42%
- 3Y*
- -87.32%
- 5Y*
- -80.20%
- 10Y*
- -79.49%
TMF vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 0.08% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | -93.36% | -85.53% | -59.55% | -84.56% | 15.76% | -80.94% | -92.90% | -83.81% | -19.39% | -69.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMF and SOXS is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2010 | 0.20 |
The correlation between TMF and SOXS shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMF vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank
TMF
SOXS
TMF vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMF | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.64 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | -1.00 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.00 | -1.52 | +1.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMF vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMF drawdown since its inception was -92.89%, smaller than the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMF and SOXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMF | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.89% | -100.00% | +7.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | -97.88% | +71.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.09% | -99.87% | +43.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.81% | -99.98% | +11.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.89% | -100.00% | +7.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.71% | -100.00% | +8.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.78% | -92.61% | +48.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.28% | 64.84% | -52.56% |
Volatility
TMF vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) is 7.26%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) has a volatility of 67.13%. This indicates that TMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMF | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 67.13% | -59.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.68% | 100.53% | -80.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.15% | 117.64% | -89.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.63% | 111.43% | -64.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.87% | 102.11% | -58.24% |
TMF vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMF has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMF vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison
TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than SOXS's 55.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | 55.66% | 10.79% | 5.45% | 9.22% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 2.30% | 0.76% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 3.95% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMF and SOXS have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXS has higher volatility (67.13%) compared to TMF (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMF dropped -92.89% vs SOXS's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, TMF leads with -16.47% vs -79.49% for SOXS. On fees, TMF is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TMF has performed better with a -16.47% return vs -79.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMF is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.
SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 55.66%, compared with 3.95% for TMF.
TMF is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while SOXS is Inverse Equities. TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while SOXS tracks PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TMF and 1.08% for SOXS.
TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.00 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMF and SOXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer