TMF vs. PCN
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN).
TMF is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (300%). It was launched on Apr 16, 2009. PCN is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 20, 2001.
Performance
TMF vs. PCN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMF vs. PCN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMF Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X | -2.78% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund | -4.21% | 5.55% | 19.52% | 16.22% | -22.88% | 6.93% | -2.19% | 39.10% | -5.94% | 26.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMF achieves a -2.78% return, which is significantly higher than PCN's -4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, TMF has underperformed PCN with an annualized return of -15.78%, while PCN has yielded a comparatively higher 8.27% annualized return.
TMF
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -13.14%
- YTD
- -2.78%
- 6M
- -8.60%
- 1Y
- -14.86%
- 3Y*
- -23.40%
- 5Y*
- -29.30%
- 10Y*
- -15.78%
PCN
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -6.22%
- 1Y
- -3.05%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMF vs. PCN - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMF has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than PCN's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMF vs. PCN — Risk / Return Rank
TMF
PCN
TMF vs. PCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMF | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | -0.20 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | -0.15 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.97 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | -0.20 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | -0.66 | -0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMF | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | -0.20 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.63 | 0.14 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.36 | 0.38 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.39 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMF and PCN is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TMF vs. PCN - Dividend Comparison
TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than PCN's 11.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMF Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X | 4.01% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund | 11.34% | 10.58% | 10.06% | 10.88% | 12.66% | 7.89% | 7.83% | 7.37% | 9.60% | 7.85% | 11.98% | 10.22% |
Drawdowns
TMF vs. PCN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMF drawdown since its inception was -92.61%, which is greater than PCN's maximum drawdown of -61.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMF and PCN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMF | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.61% | -61.12% | -31.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.13% | -13.78% | -13.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.37% | -33.39% | -54.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.61% | -50.27% | -42.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.95% | -6.71% | -85.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.13% | -7.22% | -35.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.93% | 4.32% | +12.61% |
Volatility
TMF vs. PCN - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF) has a higher volatility of 10.85% compared to PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) at 5.81%. This indicates that TMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMF | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.85% | 5.81% | +5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.51% | 8.64% | +10.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.89% | 15.69% | +18.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.85% | 16.55% | +30.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.00% | 21.97% | +22.03% |