PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCN vs. PDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCN vs. PDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCN achieves a -3.03% return, which is significantly lower than PDO's -1.64% return.


PCN

1D
-0.68%
1M
1.06%
YTD
-3.03%
6M
-1.80%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
6.99%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*
7.11%

PDO

1D
-0.85%
1M
2.03%
YTD
-1.64%
6M
-1.71%
1Y
8.19%
3Y*
11.80%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCN vs. PDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PCN
PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund
-3.03%5.55%19.52%16.22%-22.88%5.50%
PDO
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
-1.64%13.96%24.55%8.06%-23.40%5.98%

Correlation

The correlation between PCN and PDO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021

0.52

The correlation between PCN and PDO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCN vs. PDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCN
PCN Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCN Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCN Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

PDO
PDO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCN vs. PDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCNPDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.18

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

0.74

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.04

2.51

-1.47

PCN vs. PDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCN Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the PDO Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCN and PDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCN vs. PDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCN drawdown since its inception was -61.12%, which is greater than PDO's maximum drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCN and PDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCNPDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.12%

-36.83%

-24.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-11.18%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.53%

-16.55%

-5.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.39%

-36.83%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

-5.46%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-14.34%

+7.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

3.27%

+0.50%

Volatility

PCN vs. PDO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) is 2.66%, while Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that PCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCNPDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

3.95%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.21%

9.33%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.80%

10.35%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.16%

15.80%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.95%

15.54%

+6.41%

Dividends

PCN vs. PDO - Dividend Comparison

PCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.53%, less than PDO's 11.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCN
PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund
11.53%10.58%10.06%10.88%12.66%7.89%7.83%7.37%9.60%7.85%11.98%10.22%
PDO
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
11.93%11.09%11.29%12.54%19.09%8.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCN and PDO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDO has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to PCN (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCN dropped -61.12% vs PDO's -36.83%.

PDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCN and PDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer