PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMF vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMF vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TMF

1D
-0.62%
1M
4.96%
YTD
-4.67%
6M
-5.95%
1Y
-2.80%
3Y*
-21.07%
5Y*
-31.33%
10Y*
-16.87%

MUU

1D
-26.28%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMF vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TMF and MUU is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMF vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMF
TMF Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

MUU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMF vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMFMUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.23

TMF vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMF vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMF drawdown since its inception was -92.89%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMF and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMFMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.89%

-26.28%

-66.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.11%

-26.28%

-65.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.76%

-10.19%

-33.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.26%

Volatility

TMF vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMFMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.91%

295.32%

-267.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.59%

295.32%

-248.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.86%

295.32%

-251.46%

TMF vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TMF and MUU have an expense ratio of 1.01%.


Dividends

TMF vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, while MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMF
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF
4.09%4.06%4.29%2.82%1.62%0.13%2.23%0.94%1.49%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMF and MUU have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.01% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TMF and MUU have the same expense ratio: 1.01% per year.

TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.

TMF is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily).

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMF and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer