TMF vs. MUU
TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.01% expense ratio.
Performance
TMF vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMF
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- -4.67%
- 6M
- -5.95%
- 1Y
- -2.80%
- 3Y*
- -21.07%
- 5Y*
- -31.33%
- 10Y*
- -16.87%
MUU
- 1D
- -26.28%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMF vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 0.54% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMF and MUU is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMF vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
TMF
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TMF vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMF | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMF vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMF drawdown since its inception was -92.89%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMF and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMF | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.89% | -26.28% | -66.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.11% | -26.28% | -65.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.76% | -10.19% | -33.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.26% | — | — |
Volatility
TMF vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMF | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.91% | 295.32% | -267.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.59% | 295.32% | -248.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.86% | 295.32% | -251.46% |
TMF vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TMF and MUU have an expense ratio of 1.01%.
Dividends
TMF vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, while MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.09% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMF and MUU have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.01% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMF and MUU have the same expense ratio: 1.01% per year.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.
TMF is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily).
Find the right allocation for TMF and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer