TMF vs. MU
TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) is Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, TMF returned -16.87%/yr vs 55.83%/yr for MU. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
TMF vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMF achieves a -5.18% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 244.07% return. Over the past 10 years, TMF has underperformed MU with an annualized return of -16.87%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 55.83% annualized return.
TMF
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 7.62%
- YTD
- -5.18%
- 6M
- -5.04%
- 1Y
- -1.79%
- 3Y*
- -19.82%
- 5Y*
- -31.10%
- 10Y*
- -16.87%
MU
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 35.46%
- YTD
- 244.07%
- 6M
- 307.41%
- 1Y
- 751.18%
- 3Y*
- 144.69%
- 5Y*
- 66.21%
- 10Y*
- 55.83%
TMF vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -5.18% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 244.07% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMF and MU is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2009 | -0.18 |
The correlation between TMF and MU shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (all time) to 0.03 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMF vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
TMF
MU
TMF vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMF | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -11.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.78 | -0.79 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 24.91 | -25.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 94.64 | -95.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMF vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMF drawdown since its inception was -92.89%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMF and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMF | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.89% | -98.25% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | -30.28% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.31% | -57.63% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.81% | -57.63% | -31.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.89% | -57.63% | -35.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.15% | -9.07% | -83.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.70% | -58.16% | +14.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.96% | 7.95% | +4.01% |
Volatility
TMF vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) is 8.43%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 32.86%. This indicates that TMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMF | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.43% | 32.86% | -24.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.46% | 57.74% | -38.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.49% | 69.66% | -41.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.72% | 53.18% | -6.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.92% | 50.12% | -6.20% |
Dividends
TMF vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.11% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMF and MU have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (32.86%) compared to TMF (8.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMF dropped -92.89% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMF and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer