TMDV vs. SCHD
TMDV (ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMDV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TMDV returned 2.41%/yr vs 8.36%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMDV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
TMDV vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMDV achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return.
TMDV
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 4.53%
- 6M
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- 5.96%
- 3Y*
- 4.85%
- 5Y*
- 2.41%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
TMDV vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 4.53% | 2.91% | 2.64% | 2.25% | -5.10% | 23.45% | 4.82% | 3.26% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 2.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMDV and SCHD is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between TMDV and SCHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
TMDV vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMDV
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Energy
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
TMDV
SCHD
Financial Services
TMDV
SCHD
Industrials
TMDV
SCHD
Utilities
TMDV
SCHD
Basic Materials
TMDV
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
TMDV
SCHD
Healthcare
TMDV
SCHD
Real Estate
TMDV
SCHD
-
Energy
TMDV
SCHD
Technology
TMDV
SCHD
Communication Services
TMDV
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMDV vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
TMDV
SCHD
TMDV vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMDV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.45 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 5.91 | -5.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.50 | 14.53 | -13.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMDV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | 2.49 | -2.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.58 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.86 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
TMDV vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMDV drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDV and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMDV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.42% | -33.37% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -4.61% | -5.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.02% | -16.13% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.11% | -16.85% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.56% | -1.40% | -5.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -3.32% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 1.88% | +2.11% |
Volatility
TMDV vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that TMDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMDV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 2.66% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.53% | 7.66% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10% | 10.96% | +1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 14.38% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.64% | 16.72% | +1.92% |
TMDV vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMDV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMDV vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 2.62% | 2.65% | 2.70% | 2.45% | 2.46% | 2.14% | 2.28% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMDV and SCHD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMDV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMDV dropped -33.42% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 5-year performance, SCHD leads with 8.36% vs 2.41% for TMDV. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 8.36% return vs 2.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TMDV.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.62% for TMDV.
TMDV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. TMDV tracks Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TMDV and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMDV and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer