PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMDV vs. FOVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMDV vs. FOVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TMDV

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.05%
YTD
4.53%
6M
4.29%
1Y
5.96%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*

FOVL

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMDV vs. FOVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
4.53%2.91%2.64%2.25%-5.10%23.45%4.82%3.26%
FOVL
iShares Focused Value Factor ETF
0.00%6.43%22.87%17.72%-9.39%40.14%-13.20%1.88%

Correlation

The correlation between TMDV and FOVL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between TMDV and FOVL has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TMDV vs. FOVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TMDV
FOVL

Consumer Defensive

23.8%
5.0%

Financial Services

16.0%
44.6%

Industrials

15.9%
12.8%

Utilities

12.3%
7.5%

Basic Materials

11.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
5.2%

Healthcare

5.6%
4.9%

Real Estate

4.6%
2.6%

Energy

3.0%
7.7%

Technology

1.5%
5.0%

Communication Services

-

4.7%

Consumer Defensive

TMDV
23.8%
FOVL
5.0%

Financial Services

TMDV
16.0%
FOVL
44.6%

Industrials

TMDV
15.9%
FOVL
12.8%

Utilities

TMDV
12.3%
FOVL
7.5%

Basic Materials

TMDV
11.7%
FOVL

-

Consumer Cyclical

TMDV
5.8%
FOVL
5.2%

Healthcare

TMDV
5.6%
FOVL
4.9%

Real Estate

TMDV
4.6%
FOVL
2.6%

Energy

TMDV
3.0%
FOVL
7.7%

Technology

TMDV
1.5%
FOVL
5.0%

Communication Services

TMDV

-

FOVL
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMDV vs. FOVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMDV
TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FOVL
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMDV vs. FOVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMDVFOVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.50

TMDV vs. FOVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMDVFOVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

Drawdowns

TMDV vs. FOVL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMDVFOVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

Volatility

TMDV vs. FOVL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMDVFOVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.64%

TMDV vs. FOVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMDV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FOVL's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMDV vs. FOVL - Dividend Comparison

TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than FOVL's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FOVL
iShares Focused Value Factor ETF
0.55%1.36%2.08%2.59%3.38%2.80%2.88%2.09%
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
2.62%2.65%2.70%2.45%2.46%2.14%2.28%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMDV and FOVL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FOVL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FOVL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TMDV.

TMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.55% for FOVL.

TMDV tracks Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index, while FOVL tracks MSCI USA IMI Focused Value Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TMDV and 0.25% for FOVL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMDV and FOVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer