TMDV vs. FOVL
TMDV (ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF) and FOVL (iShares Focused Value Factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - TMDV tracks the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index while FOVL tracks the MSCI USA IMI Focused Value Factor Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMDV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FOVL.
Performance
TMDV vs. FOVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMDV
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 4.53%
- 6M
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- 5.96%
- 3Y*
- 4.85%
- 5Y*
- 2.41%
- 10Y*
- —
FOVL
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMDV vs. FOVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 4.53% | 2.91% | 2.64% | 2.25% | -5.10% | 23.45% | 4.82% | 3.26% |
FOVL iShares Focused Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 6.43% | 22.87% | 17.72% | -9.39% | 40.14% | -13.20% | 1.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMDV and FOVL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TMDV and FOVL has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
TMDV vs. FOVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMDV
FOVL
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
TMDV
FOVL
Financial Services
TMDV
FOVL
Industrials
TMDV
FOVL
Utilities
TMDV
FOVL
Basic Materials
TMDV
FOVL
-
Consumer Cyclical
TMDV
FOVL
Healthcare
TMDV
FOVL
Real Estate
TMDV
FOVL
Energy
TMDV
FOVL
Technology
TMDV
FOVL
Communication Services
TMDV
-
FOVL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMDV vs. FOVL — Risk / Return Rank
TMDV
FOVL
TMDV vs. FOVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMDV | FOVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.50 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMDV | FOVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | — | — |
Drawdowns
TMDV vs. FOVL - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMDV | FOVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.56% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | — | — |
Volatility
TMDV vs. FOVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMDV | FOVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.43% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.64% | — | — |
TMDV vs. FOVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMDV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FOVL's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMDV vs. FOVL - Dividend Comparison
TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than FOVL's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOVL iShares Focused Value Factor ETF | 0.55% | 1.36% | 2.08% | 2.59% | 3.38% | 2.80% | 2.88% | 2.09% |
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 2.62% | 2.65% | 2.70% | 2.45% | 2.46% | 2.14% | 2.28% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMDV and FOVL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FOVL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FOVL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TMDV.
TMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.55% for FOVL.
TMDV tracks Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index, while FOVL tracks MSCI USA IMI Focused Value Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TMDV and 0.25% for FOVL.
Find the right allocation for TMDV and FOVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer