PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOVL vs. QVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOVL vs. QVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FOVL

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

QVAL

1D
-0.54%
1M
3.77%
6M
14.38%
YTD
20.72%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
11.94%
ALL TIME*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.37M$1.75M$1.48M

FOVL vs. QVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FOVL
iShares Focused Value Factor ETF
0.00%6.43%22.87%17.72%-9.39%40.14%-13.20%7.00%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
20.72%10.98%12.21%28.40%-11.80%34.40%-5.93%10.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FOVL and QVAL is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between FOVL and QVAL has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FOVL vs. QVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FOVL
QVAL

Financial Services

44.6%

-

Industrials

12.8%
12.3%

Energy

7.7%
20.3%

Utilities

7.5%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
21.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
5.9%

Technology

5.0%
10.0%

Healthcare

4.9%
14.1%

Communication Services

4.7%
5.8%

Real Estate

2.6%
2.0%

Basic Materials

-

8.0%

Financial Services

FOVL
44.6%
QVAL

-

Industrials

FOVL
12.8%
QVAL
12.3%

Energy

FOVL
7.7%
QVAL
20.3%

Utilities

FOVL
7.5%
QVAL
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FOVL
5.2%
QVAL
21.6%

Consumer Defensive

FOVL
5.0%
QVAL
5.9%

Technology

FOVL
5.0%
QVAL
10.0%

Healthcare

FOVL
4.9%
QVAL
14.1%

Communication Services

FOVL
4.7%
QVAL
5.8%

Real Estate

FOVL
2.6%
QVAL
2.0%

Basic Materials

FOVL

-

QVAL
8.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOVL vs. QVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FOVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FOVL vs. QVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOVLQVALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.14

FOVL vs. QVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOVL vs. QVAL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOVLQVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

Volatility

FOVL vs. QVAL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOVLQVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.70%

FOVL vs. QVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOVL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QVAL's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOVL vs. QVAL - Dividend Comparison

FOVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FOVL
iShares Focused Value Factor ETF
0.00%1.36%2.08%2.59%3.38%2.80%2.88%2.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.42%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOVL and QVAL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FOVL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FOVL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QVAL.

QVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.00% for FOVL.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FOVL and 0.28% for QVAL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOVL and QVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer