PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMDV vs. BITO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TMDV vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TMDV vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
4.14%2.91%2.64%2.25%-5.10%7.44%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-22.79%-11.19%104.45%137.33%-63.91%-31.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMDV achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -22.79% return.


TMDV

1D
0.27%
1M
-6.06%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.03%
1Y
5.15%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*

BITO

1D
0.60%
1M
-1.72%
YTD
-22.79%
6M
-43.10%
1Y
-23.27%
3Y*
24.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TMDV vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMDV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TMDV vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMDV
TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMDV vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMDVBITODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.35

-0.52

+0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.61

-0.50

+1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.94

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

-0.42

+0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.42

-0.89

+2.30

TMDV vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMDV and BITO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMDVBITODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

-0.52

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

-0.08

+0.38

Correlation

The correlation between TMDV and BITO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TMDV vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than BITO's 80.47% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
2.63%2.65%2.70%2.45%2.46%2.14%2.28%0.16%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
80.47%78.29%61.59%15.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TMDV vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMDV drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDV and BITO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TMDVBITODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.42%

-77.86%

+44.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-50.05%

+39.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.91%

-46.75%

+39.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-36.57%

+31.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

23.73%

-20.08%

Volatility

TMDV vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) is 3.78%, while ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a volatility of 12.84%. This indicates that TMDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TMDVBITODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

12.84%

-9.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

36.71%

-28.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.86%

45.32%

-30.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

55.77%

-41.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

55.77%

-36.99%