TMC vs. ALB
TMC (TMC the metals company Inc.) and ALB (Albemarle Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — TMC in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, ALB in Specialty Chemicals. Over the past 3 years, TMC returned 68.25%/yr vs -7.90%/yr for ALB. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TMC vs. ALB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMC achieves a -11.99% return, which is significantly lower than ALB's 21.10% return.
TMC
- 1D
- 5.85%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- -11.99%
- 6M
- -18.22%
- 1Y
- 13.12%
- 3Y*
- 68.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALB
- 1D
- 7.42%
- 1M
- -14.97%
- YTD
- 21.10%
- 6M
- 29.03%
- 1Y
- 178.26%
- 3Y*
- -7.90%
- 5Y*
- 1.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
TMC vs. ALB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMC TMC the metals company Inc. | -11.99% | 450.89% | 1.82% | 42.86% | -62.98% | -81.18% |
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 21.10% | 67.72% | -39.50% | -32.80% | -6.63% | -3.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMC and ALB is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2021 | 0.23 |
The correlation between TMC and ALB shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TMC:
$1.75T
ALB:
$20.21B
TMC:
-$0.00
ALB:
-$2.33
TMC:
$0.00
ALB:
$5.49B
TMC:
-$136.00K
ALB:
$1.02B
TMC:
-$296.72M
ALB:
$801.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMC vs. ALB — Risk / Return Rank
TMC
ALB
TMC vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMC | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.38 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 5.66 | -5.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.35 | 17.15 | -16.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMC vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMC drawdown since its inception was -95.58%, which is greater than ALB's maximum drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMC and ALB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMC | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.58% | -83.90% | -11.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.65% | -31.72% | -29.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.56% | -78.60% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -83.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -83.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.39% | -44.87% | -11.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.43% | -20.68% | -58.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.93% | 10.46% | +27.47% |
Volatility
TMC vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison
TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) has a higher volatility of 24.27% compared to Albemarle Corporation (ALB) at 16.97%. This indicates that TMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMC | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.27% | 16.97% | +7.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.29% | 42.66% | +25.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.72% | 62.67% | +42.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.21% | 54.64% | +58.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 113.21% | 48.35% | +64.86% |
Dividends
TMC vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison
TMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 1.19% | 1.15% | 1.87% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% |
TMC TMC the metals company Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TMC vs. ALB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TMC the metals company Inc. and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TMC and ALB have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMC has higher volatility (24.27%) compared to ALB (16.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMC dropped -95.58% vs ALB's -83.90%.
ALB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMC and ALB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer