TMAT vs. ARMH

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH).

TMAT and ARMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TMAT is a passively managed fund by Main Management that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2021. ARMH is an actively managed fund by Precidian. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025.

Performance

TMAT vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TMAT vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF	-5.56%	37.30%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	42.50%	-2.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMAT achieves a -5.56% return, which is significantly lower than ARMH's 42.50% return.

TMAT

• 1D: 1.85%
• 1M: -5.75%
• YTD: -5.56%
• 6M: -13.53%
• 1Y: 32.46%
• 3Y*: 18.67%
• 5Y*: -0.10%
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: 25.03%
• YTD: 42.50%
• 6M: 4.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMAT vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMAT has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

TMAT

Main Thematic Innovation ETF

ARMH

Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF

Return for Risk

TMAT vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMAT

TMAT Risk / Return Rank: 54
TMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
TMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
TMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
TMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
TMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMAT vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TMAT	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.83	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMAT	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	0.85	-0.88

Correlation

The correlation between TMAT and ARMH is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TMAT vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

TMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than ARMH's 2.37% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.34%	0.20%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	2.37%	2.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TMAT vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMAT drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -42.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAT and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMAT	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.55%	-42.04%	-16.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.51%	-12.19%	-5.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.06%	-16.31%	-16.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.77%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TMAT	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.02%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.77%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.80%	50.51%	-20.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.49%	50.51%	-20.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.78%	50.51%	-19.73%