TMAT vs. QTUM-USD
TMAT (Main Thematic Innovation ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index, while QTUM-USD (Qtum) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 5 years, TMAT returned 4.62%/yr vs -35.43%/yr for QTUM-USD. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TMAT vs. QTUM-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMAT achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly higher than QTUM-USD's -48.39% return.
TMAT
- 1D
- -3.52%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 18.93%
- 6M
- 16.10%
- 1Y
- 34.95%
- 3Y*
- 27.57%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM-USD
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -22.26%
- YTD
- -48.39%
- 6M
- -45.22%
- 1Y
- -65.23%
- 3Y*
- -34.08%
- 5Y*
- -35.43%
- 10Y*
- —
TMAT vs. QTUM-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF | 18.93% | 20.06% | 27.20% | 32.32% | -39.29% | -18.01% |
QTUM-USD Qtum | -48.39% | -55.51% | -19.33% | 103.93% | -79.08% | 167.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMAT and QTUM-USD is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMAT vs. QTUM-USD — Risk / Return Rank
TMAT
QTUM-USD
TMAT vs. QTUM-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) and Qtum (QTUM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMAT | QTUM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.88 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | -0.83 | +2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.77 | -1.22 | +4.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMAT vs. QTUM-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMAT drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum QTUM-USD drawdown of -99.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAT and QTUM-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMAT | QTUM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.55% | -99.29% | +40.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.63% | -78.28% | +56.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.42% | -88.20% | +54.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.10% | -96.22% | +44.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.36% | -99.27% | +94.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.93% | -93.28% | +61.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.30% | 46.72% | -37.42% |
Volatility
TMAT vs. QTUM-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) is 11.45%, while Qtum (QTUM-USD) has a volatility of 19.73%. This indicates that TMAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMAT | QTUM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.45% | 19.73% | -8.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.86% | 50.20% | -31.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.75% | 67.31% | -41.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.83% | 77.19% | -46.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.75% | 99.23% | -68.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMAT and QTUM-USD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM-USD has higher volatility (19.73%) compared to TMAT (11.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMAT dropped -58.55% vs QTUM-USD's -99.29%.
TMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMAT and QTUM-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer