TMAAX vs. AAMBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) and Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX).
TMAAX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 30, 2005. AAMBX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Dec 2, 1976.
Performance
TMAAX vs. AAMBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMAAX vs. AAMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | -2.02% | 15.13% | 19.29% | 17.06% | -17.79% | 15.74% | 14.13% | 21.47% | -6.30% | 11.50% |
AAMBX Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund | -0.53% | 3.39% | 2.70% | 6.18% | -10.93% | 1.99% | 4.78% | 7.38% | 0.32% | 4.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMAAX achieves a -2.02% return, which is significantly lower than AAMBX's -0.53% return. Over the past 10 years, TMAAX has outperformed AAMBX with an annualized return of 8.97%, while AAMBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.68% annualized return.
TMAAX
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- -4.78%
- YTD
- -2.02%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 14.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
AAMBX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 2.59%
- 3Y*
- 2.94%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMAAX vs. AAMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMAAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than AAMBX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMAAX vs. AAMBX — Risk / Return Rank
TMAAX
AAMBX
TMAAX vs. AAMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) and Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMAAX | AAMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 0.50 | +0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 0.70 | +0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.14 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 0.67 | +0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.30 | 1.79 | +5.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMAAX | AAMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 0.50 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.09 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.38 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.45 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMAAX and AAMBX is -0.08. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TMAAX vs. AAMBX - Dividend Comparison
TMAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%, more than AAMBX's 3.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | 7.44% | 7.29% | 11.82% | 3.55% | 3.03% | 6.94% | 4.16% | 6.27% | 6.01% | 1.10% | 0.99% | 0.76% |
AAMBX Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund | 3.54% | 4.65% | 3.93% | 2.58% | 2.97% | 2.66% | 2.80% | 3.35% | 3.45% | 3.40% | 3.41% | 3.39% |
Drawdowns
TMAAX vs. AAMBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMAAX drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, roughly equal to the maximum AAMBX drawdown of -49.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAAX and AAMBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMAAX | AAMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.54% | -49.18% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.88% | -5.89% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.55% | -16.17% | -10.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.99% | -16.17% | -10.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.44% | -2.44% | -3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.41% | -5.22% | -2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.20% | -0.05% |
Volatility
TMAAX vs. AAMBX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX) at 1.42%. This indicates that TMAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMAAX | AAMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | 1.42% | +3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.98% | 2.02% | +5.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.13% | 6.12% | +8.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 4.72% | +9.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 4.40% | +8.89% |