AAMBX vs. TMSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX).
AAMBX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Dec 2, 1976. TMSIX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 30, 1993.
Performance
AAMBX vs. TMSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AAMBX vs. TMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAMBX Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund | -0.93% | 3.39% | 2.70% | 6.18% | -10.93% | 1.99% | 4.78% | 7.38% | 0.32% | 4.47% |
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | -2.40% | 4.64% | 14.08% | 13.90% | -17.68% | 28.06% | 21.96% | 24.88% | -10.47% | 18.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAMBX achieves a -0.93% return, which is significantly higher than TMSIX's -2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, AAMBX has underperformed TMSIX with an annualized return of 1.64%, while TMSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.16% annualized return.
AAMBX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- -0.93%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 2.59%
- 3Y*
- 2.81%
- 5Y*
- 0.38%
- 10Y*
- 1.64%
TMSIX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -8.39%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -0.70%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AAMBX vs. TMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AAMBX and TMSIX have an expense ratio of 0.74%.
Return for Risk
AAMBX vs. TMSIX — Risk / Return Rank
AAMBX
TMSIX
AAMBX vs. TMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAMBX | TMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.58 | 0.34 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.82 | 0.62 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.08 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 0.34 | +0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.75 | 1.38 | +0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAMBX | TMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 0.34 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.25 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.55 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.44 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between AAMBX and TMSIX is -0.10. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
AAMBX vs. TMSIX - Dividend Comparison
AAMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than TMSIX's 12.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAMBX Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund | 3.55% | 4.65% | 3.93% | 2.58% | 2.97% | 2.66% | 2.80% | 3.35% | 3.45% | 3.40% | 3.41% | 3.39% |
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | 12.70% | 12.39% | 7.91% | 1.48% | 2.86% | 10.77% | 3.26% | 2.77% | 11.64% | 7.92% | 4.10% | 11.95% |
Drawdowns
AAMBX vs. TMSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAMBX drawdown since its inception was -49.18%, smaller than the maximum TMSIX drawdown of -56.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAMBX and TMSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAMBX | TMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.18% | -56.10% | +6.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.89% | -13.29% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.17% | -31.57% | +15.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.17% | -40.66% | +24.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.83% | -8.97% | +6.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -10.06% | +4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 3.29% | -1.10% |
Volatility
AAMBX vs. TMSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX) is 1.35%, while Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that AAMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AAMBX | TMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 5.48% | -4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.99% | 10.71% | -8.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.11% | 19.02% | -12.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.71% | 20.37% | -15.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.40% | 20.40% | -16.00% |