TLTX vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLTX is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. TLTX is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. TLTX charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

TLTX vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTX achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 23.18% return.

TLTX

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 2.89%
• YTD: 1.95%
• 6M: 1.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ENFR

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: -5.86%
• YTD: 23.18%
• 6M: 23.40%
• 1Y: 25.06%
• 3Y*: 28.30%
• 5Y*: 19.73%
• 10Y*: 11.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTX vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF	1.95%	6.02%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	23.18%	1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTX and ENFR is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	-0.11

Return for Risk

TLTX vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 55
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTX vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TLTX	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.69	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.35	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.91	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.39	—

Drawdowns

TLTX vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTX drawdown since its inception was -6.35%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTX and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLTX	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.35%	-68.28%	+61.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.64%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.82%	-6.04%	+4.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.29%	-15.93%	+13.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.40%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TLTX	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.68%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.28%	14.91%	-5.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.28%	19.26%	-9.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.28%	24.68%	-15.40%

TLTX vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLTX vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

TLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.11%, more than ENFR's 4.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.07%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF	17.11%	7.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLTX and ENFR in my portfolio?

TLTX and ENFR have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TLTX or ENFR?

On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TLTX or ENFR?

TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ENFR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TLTX or ENFR?

TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 17.11%, compared with 4.07% for ENFR.

What is the main difference between TLTX and ENFR?

TLTX is categorized as Government Bonds, while ENFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for TLTX and 0.35% for ENFR.