TLTX vs. QYLD
TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLTX is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. TLTX is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, TLTX returned -0.67% vs 20.66% for QYLD. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TLTX charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
TLTX vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLTX achieves a -3.11% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.67% return.
TLTX
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- 6M
- -2.90%
- YTD
- -3.11%
- 1Y
- -0.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.62%
QYLD
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 5.88%
- YTD
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.32%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $83.30M | $78.68M | $98.28M | |
| $202.98K | $200.23K | $333.11K |
TLTX vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | -3.11% | 6.02% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.67% | 11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLTX and QYLD is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLTX vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
TLTX
QYLD
TLTX vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLTX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.35 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 3.38 | -3.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.17 | 15.70 | -15.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLTX vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLTX drawdown since its inception was -6.70%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTX and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLTX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.70% | -24.75% | +18.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.70% | -5.78% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.70% | -2.96% | -3.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.49% | -3.81% | +1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 1.24% | +1.79% |
Volatility
TLTX vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) is 2.95%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that TLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLTX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 5.19% | -2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.29% | 10.04% | -2.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.44% | 11.26% | -1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.44% | 15.04% | -5.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.44% | 15.63% | -6.19% |
TLTX vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLTX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLTX vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
TLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.30%, more than QYLD's 11.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.89% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 19.30% | 7.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLTX and QYLD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QYLD has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to TLTX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTX dropped -6.70% vs QYLD's -24.75%.
On 1-year performance, QYLD leads with 20.66% vs -0.67% for TLTX. On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, TLTX has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 20.66% return vs -0.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.
TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 19.30%, compared with 11.89% for QYLD.
TLTX is categorized as Government Bonds, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for TLTX and 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLTX and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer