PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTX vs. XHLF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTX vs. XHLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTX achieves a -3.11% return, which is significantly lower than XHLF's 1.96% return.


TLTX

1D
-1.91%
1M
-3.51%
6M
-2.90%
YTD
-3.11%
1Y
-0.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.62%

XHLF

1D
0.02%
1M
0.24%
6M
1.68%
YTD
1.96%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$202.98K$200.23K$333.11K
$10.55M$16.65M$18.60M

TLTX vs. XHLF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TLTX and XHLF is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTX vs. XHLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TLTX
TLTX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

XHLF
XHLF Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
XHLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHLF Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
XHLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHLF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TLTX vs. XHLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLTXXHLFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-11.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-42.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

10.51

-9.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

97.08

-97.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.17

630.33

-630.50

TLTX vs. XHLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the XHLF Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTX and XHLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLTX vs. XHLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTX drawdown since its inception was -6.70%, which is greater than XHLF's maximum drawdown of -0.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTX and XHLF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTXXHLFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.70%

-0.11%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.70%

-0.04%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.70%

0.00%

-6.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

0.00%

-2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

0.01%

+3.02%

Volatility

TLTX vs. XHLF - Volatility Comparison

Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) at 0.10%. This indicates that TLTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTXXHLFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

0.10%

+2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.29%

0.22%

+7.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.44%

0.32%

+9.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.44%

0.41%

+9.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.44%

0.41%

+9.03%

TLTX vs. XHLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XHLF's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTX vs. XHLF - Dividend Comparison

TLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.30%, more than XHLF's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
TLTX
Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF
19.30%7.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF
3.49%3.98%4.96%4.50%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTX and XHLF have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLTX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to XHLF (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTX dropped -6.70% vs XHLF's -0.11%.

On 1-year performance, XHLF leads with 3.72% vs -0.67% for TLTX. On fees, XHLF is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XHLF has been the lower-risk option at 0.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XHLF has performed better with a 3.72% return vs -0.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XHLF is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TLTX.

TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 19.30%, compared with 3.49% for XHLF.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for TLTX and 0.03% for XHLF.

XHLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTX and XHLF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer