TLTE vs. EFAS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TLTE (FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - TLTE tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index while EFAS tracks the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TLTE returned 7.43%/yr vs 12.06%/yr for EFAS. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TLTE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.

Performance

TLTE vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTE achieves a 23.54% return, which is significantly higher than EFAS's 13.06% return.

TLTE

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 3.64%
• YTD: 23.54%
• 6M: 25.97%
• 1Y: 45.35%
• 3Y*: 22.09%
• 5Y*: 7.43%
• 10Y*: 9.47%

EFAS

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -1.69%
• YTD: 13.06%
• 6M: 17.18%
• 1Y: 28.75%
• 3Y*: 24.51%
• 5Y*: 12.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTE vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TLTE FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index	23.54%	30.21%	3.53%	13.62%	-17.31%	4.79%	12.10%	14.51%	-17.44%	32.82%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	13.06%	46.83%	3.07%	14.65%	-8.00%	12.75%	-5.42%	14.60%	-11.60%	22.76%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTE and EFAS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2016	0.60

The correlation between TLTE and EFAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TLTE vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TLTE	EFAS
Technology	27.3%	0.1%
Financial Services	18.9%	30.1%
Industrials	11.7%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	1.9%
Basic Materials	7.7%	1.8%
Communication Services	4.6%	8.6%
Energy	4.4%	13.7%
Real Estate	4.3%	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	8.1%
Utilities	3.1%	14.4%
Healthcare	3.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

TLTE vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTE

TLTE Risk / Return Rank: 75
TLTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
TLTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
TLTE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
TLTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
TLTE Martin Ratio Rank: 74

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 83
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTE vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TLTE	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.73	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	3.84	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.47	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	5.45	-1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.71	14.46	-0.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TLTE vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTE and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TLTE	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	2.73	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.78	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.56	-0.22

Drawdowns

TLTE vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTE drawdown since its inception was -44.21%, roughly equal to the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTE and EFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLTE	EFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.21%	-44.38%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.04%	-5.30%	-7.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.43%	-11.84%	-5.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.51%	-28.81%	-4.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.98%	-2.92%	+0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.15%	-7.07%	-5.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.32%	1.99%	+1.33%

Volatility

TLTE vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) has a higher volatility of 7.87% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 2.76%. This indicates that TLTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TLTE	EFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.87%	2.76%	+5.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.12%	8.19%	+7.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.43%	10.57%	+7.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.83%	15.59%	+1.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.40%	18.33%	+0.07%

TLTE vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLTE vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

TLTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than EFAS's 4.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.72%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%	0.00%
TLTE FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index	3.04%	3.76%	3.73%	4.03%	4.42%	3.21%	1.95%	3.23%	3.02%	2.12%	2.30%	2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLTE and EFAS in my portfolio?

TLTE and EFAS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TLTE or EFAS?

TLTE has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to EFAS (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTE dropped -44.21% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

Which ETF is better, TLTE or EFAS?

On 5-year performance, EFAS leads with 12.06% vs 7.43% for TLTE. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TLTE or EFAS?

Over the 5-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 12.06% return vs 7.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TLTE or EFAS?

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TLTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TLTE or EFAS?

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 3.04% for TLTE.

What is the main difference between TLTE and EFAS?

TLTE tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index, while EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TLTE and 0.56% for EFAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.