PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLT vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLT vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLT achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 21.46% return. Over the past 10 years, TLT has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of -2.13%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.89% annualized return.


TLT

1D
-0.04%
1M
-1.94%
6M
-2.48%
YTD
-1.19%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
-1.99%
5Y*
-7.58%
10Y*
-2.13%

MTUM

1D
-2.96%
1M
-6.94%
6M
18.20%
YTD
21.46%
1Y
28.30%
3Y*
28.55%
5Y*
13.65%
10Y*
15.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLT vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-1.19%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%14.12%-1.61%9.18%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
21.46%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between TLT and MTUM is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

-0.11

The correlation between TLT and MTUM shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLT vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLT vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLTMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.22

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

2.35

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.04

8.08

-7.05

TLT vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLT and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLT vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLT drawdown since its inception was -48.35%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLT and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.35%

-34.08%

-14.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-12.11%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

-20.99%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

-32.28%

-11.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

-34.08%

-14.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.99%

-12.11%

-28.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.94%

-6.20%

-7.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

3.51%

-0.20%

Volatility

TLT vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) is 2.59%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 12.40%. This indicates that TLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

12.40%

-9.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.79%

21.91%

-15.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.35%

24.08%

-14.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.78%

21.61%

-5.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.83%

21.55%

-6.72%

TLT vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TLT and MTUM have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TLT vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

TLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than MTUM's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.61%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.64%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLT and MTUM have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (12.40%) compared to TLT (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLT dropped -48.35% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 15.89% vs -2.13% for TLT. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, TLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 15.89% return vs -2.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLT and MTUM have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.64%, compared with 0.61% for MTUM.

TLT is categorized as Government Bonds, while MTUM is Momentum. TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLT and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer