PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLT vs. FLOW.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLT vs. FLOW.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and Flow Traders BV (FLOW.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TLT is traded in USD, while FLOW.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FLOW.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLT achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than FLOW.AS's 3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, TLT has underperformed FLOW.AS with an annualized return of -1.75%, while FLOW.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 5.22% annualized return.


TLT

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.40%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.45%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
-1.38%
5Y*
-6.53%
10Y*
-1.75%

FLOW.AS

1D
2.94%
1M
-10.41%
YTD
3.18%
6M
8.68%
1Y
-9.18%
3Y*
10.48%
5Y*
-4.58%
10Y*
5.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLT vs. FLOW.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.27%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%14.12%-1.61%9.18%
FLOW.AS
Flow Traders BV
3.18%32.16%13.51%-9.98%-34.02%22.11%58.08%-20.03%41.38%-27.57%

Correlation

The correlation between TLT and FLOW.AS is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLT vs. FLOW.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOW.AS
FLOW.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FLOW.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOW.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOW.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOW.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOW.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLT vs. FLOW.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and Flow Traders BV (FLOW.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLTFLOW.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.96

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

-0.38

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.92

-0.71

+1.63

TLT vs. FLOW.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is higher than the FLOW.AS Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLT and FLOW.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLT vs. FLOW.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLT drawdown since its inception was -48.35%, smaller than the maximum FLOW.AS drawdown of -58.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLT and FLOW.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTFLOW.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.35%

-58.79%

+10.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-24.07%

+16.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-29.36%

+10.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

-58.21%

+14.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

-58.79%

+10.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.12%

-22.86%

-17.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.84%

-30.68%

+16.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

12.71%

-9.57%

Volatility

TLT vs. FLOW.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) is 2.83%, while Flow Traders BV (FLOW.AS) has a volatility of 16.08%. This indicates that TLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLOW.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTFLOW.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

16.08%

-13.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.64%

22.22%

-15.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.68%

28.66%

-18.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.85%

32.61%

-16.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

32.78%

-17.87%

Dividends

TLT vs. FLOW.AS - Dividend Comparison

TLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, while FLOW.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOW.AS
Flow Traders BV
0.00%0.00%0.70%6.12%4.85%10.87%16.81%6.27%6.11%5.00%4.73%1.10%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.56%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLT and FLOW.AS have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLT and FLOW.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer