PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLOW.AS vs. VIRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FLOW.AS vs. VIRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Flow Traders BV (FLOW.AS) and Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLOW.AS is traded in EUR, while VIRT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VIRT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLOW.AS achieves a -1.59% return, which is significantly lower than VIRT's 61.37% return. Over the past 10 years, FLOW.AS has underperformed VIRT with an annualized return of 2.88%, while VIRT has yielded a comparatively higher 15.67% annualized return.


FLOW.AS

1D
2.06%
1M
-12.65%
YTD
-1.59%
6M
4.92%
1Y
-15.17%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
-5.12%
10Y*
2.88%

VIRT

1D
2.19%
1M
6.53%
YTD
61.37%
6M
50.61%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
43.45%
5Y*
15.88%
10Y*
15.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLOW.AS vs. VIRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLOW.AS
Flow Traders BV
-1.59%16.51%21.00%-12.74%-29.80%31.04%45.22%-18.45%48.30%-36.54%
VIRT
Virtu Financial, Inc.
61.37%-15.60%95.11%1.48%-21.96%27.45%50.87%-33.39%52.81%6.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FLOW.AS and VIRT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2015

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLOW.AS vs. VIRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLOW.AS
FLOW.AS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FLOW.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOW.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOW.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOW.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOW.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

VIRT
VIRT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VIRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIRT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VIRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIRT Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLOW.AS vs. VIRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flow Traders BV (FLOW.AS) and Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLOW.ASVIRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.18

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

1.02

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.06

1.86

-2.92

FLOW.AS vs. VIRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLOW.AS Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the VIRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLOW.AS and VIRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLOW.ASVIRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

0.98

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.49

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.43

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.33

-0.28

Drawdowns

FLOW.AS vs. VIRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLOW.AS drawdown since its inception was -61.93%, which is greater than VIRT's maximum drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOW.AS and VIRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLOW.ASVIRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.93%

-54.22%

-7.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.86%

-29.19%

+5.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.55%

-29.19%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.52%

-54.22%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.52%

-54.22%

-0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.20%

-3.67%

-21.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.43%

-24.47%

-4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.42%

16.05%

-2.63%

Volatility

FLOW.AS vs. VIRT - Volatility Comparison

Flow Traders BV (FLOW.AS) has a higher volatility of 15.74% compared to Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT) at 10.72%. This indicates that FLOW.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLOW.ASVIRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.74%

10.72%

+5.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.55%

24.35%

-2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.80%

30.47%

-2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.35%

32.76%

-1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.62%

36.28%

-4.66%

Dividends

FLOW.AS vs. VIRT - Dividend Comparison

FLOW.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VIRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOW.AS
Flow Traders BV
0.00%0.00%0.70%6.12%4.85%10.87%16.81%6.27%6.11%5.00%4.73%1.10%
VIRT
Virtu Financial, Inc.
1.84%2.88%2.69%4.74%4.70%3.33%3.81%6.00%3.73%5.25%6.02%2.12%

Financials

FLOW.AS vs. VIRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flow Traders BV and Virtu Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. FLOW.AS values in EUR, VIRT values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


FLOW.AS and VIRT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLOW.AS and VIRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer