FLOW.AS vs. URTH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FLOW.AS (Flow Traders BV) is a stock, while URTH (iShares MSCI World ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index (Net). Over the past 10 years, FLOW.AS returned 2.88%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for URTH. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FLOW.AS vs. URTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Flow Traders BV (FLOW.AS) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FLOW.AS is traded in EUR, while URTH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URTH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLOW.AS achieves a -1.59% return, which is significantly lower than URTH's 11.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FLOW.AS has underperformed URTH with an annualized return of 2.88%, while URTH has yielded a comparatively higher 12.91% annualized return.

FLOW.AS

• 1D: 2.06%
• 1M: -12.65%
• YTD: -1.59%
• 6M: 4.92%
• 1Y: -15.17%
• 3Y*: 5.96%
• 5Y*: -5.12%
• 10Y*: 2.88%

URTH

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.69%
• YTD: 11.97%
• 6M: 11.38%
• 1Y: 25.19%
• 3Y*: 17.68%
• 5Y*: 13.01%
• 10Y*: 12.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLOW.AS vs. URTH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLOW.AS Flow Traders BV	-1.59%	16.51%	21.00%	-12.74%	-29.80%	31.04%	45.22%	-18.45%	48.30%	-36.54%
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF	9.98%	6.96%	26.49%	20.23%	-12.88%	31.42%	6.24%	31.04%	-4.27%	7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FLOW.AS and URTH is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2015	0.00

The correlation between FLOW.AS and URTH shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.02 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FLOW.AS vs. URTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLOW.AS

FLOW.AS Risk / Return Rank: 19
FLOW.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FLOW.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FLOW.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FLOW.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FLOW.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 19

URTH

URTH Risk / Return Rank: 59
URTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
URTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
URTH Omega Ratio Rank: 57
URTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
URTH Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLOW.AS vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flow Traders BV (FLOW.AS) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLOW.AS	URTH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	2.16	-2.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.50	2.82	-3.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.40	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.59	3.86	-4.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.06	15.85	-16.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLOW.AS vs. URTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLOW.AS Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the URTH Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLOW.AS and URTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLOW.AS	URTH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.51	2.16	-2.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.16	0.85	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09	0.75	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.75	-0.69

Drawdowns

FLOW.AS vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLOW.AS drawdown since its inception was -61.93%, which is greater than URTH's maximum drawdown of -33.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOW.AS and URTH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLOW.AS	URTH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.93%	-33.45%	-28.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.86%	-6.56%	-17.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.55%	-20.94%	-7.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.52%	-20.94%	-33.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.52%	-33.45%	-21.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.20%	-0.11%	-25.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.43%	-4.10%	-25.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.42%	1.59%	+11.83%

Volatility

FLOW.AS vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison

Flow Traders BV (FLOW.AS) has a higher volatility of 15.74% compared to iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) at 2.24%. This indicates that FLOW.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLOW.AS	URTH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.74%	2.24%	+13.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.55%	8.59%	+12.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.80%	11.76%	+16.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.35%	15.36%	+15.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.62%	17.21%	+14.41%

Dividends

FLOW.AS vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison

FLOW.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLOW.AS Flow Traders BV	0.00%	0.00%	0.70%	6.12%	4.85%	10.87%	16.81%	6.27%	6.11%	5.00%	4.73%	1.10%
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF	1.38%	1.48%	1.47%	1.70%	1.68%	1.50%	1.52%	2.16%	2.30%	1.88%	2.15%	2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLOW.AS and URTH in my portfolio?

FLOW.AS and URTH have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.