FLOW.AS vs. URTH
Compare and contrast key facts about Flow Traders BV (FLOW.AS) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH).
URTH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2012.
Performance
FLOW.AS vs. URTH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLOW.AS vs. URTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOW.AS Flow Traders BV | 10.27% | 16.51% | 21.00% | -12.74% | -29.80% | 31.04% | 45.22% | -18.45% | 48.30% | -36.54% |
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | -1.56% | 6.96% | 26.49% | 20.23% | -12.88% | 31.42% | 6.24% | 31.04% | -4.27% | 7.84% |
Different Trading Currencies
FLOW.AS is traded in EUR, while URTH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URTH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLOW.AS achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly higher than URTH's -1.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FLOW.AS has underperformed URTH with an annualized return of 1.58%, while URTH has yielded a comparatively higher 11.90% annualized return.
FLOW.AS
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 6M
- 8.54%
- 1Y
- 1.32%
- 3Y*
- 3.19%
- 5Y*
- -1.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
URTH
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 11.70%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLOW.AS vs. URTH — Risk / Return Rank
FLOW.AS
URTH
FLOW.AS vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flow Traders BV (FLOW.AS) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLOW.AS | URTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.04 | 0.62 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.26 | 0.96 | -0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.15 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 0.94 | -0.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.00 | 4.13 | -4.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLOW.AS | URTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 | 0.62 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.70 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | 0.69 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.70 | -0.61 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLOW.AS and URTH is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLOW.AS vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison
FLOW.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOW.AS Flow Traders BV | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 6.12% | 4.85% | 10.87% | 16.81% | 6.27% | 6.11% | 5.00% | 4.73% | 1.10% |
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | 1.53% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.70% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.52% | 2.16% | 2.30% | 1.88% | 2.15% | 2.35% |
Drawdowns
FLOW.AS vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLOW.AS drawdown since its inception was -61.93%, which is greater than URTH's maximum drawdown of -33.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOW.AS and URTH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLOW.AS | URTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.93% | -34.01% | -27.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.42% | -11.85% | -14.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.52% | -26.05% | -28.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.74% | -34.01% | -20.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.18% | -6.42% | -9.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.66% | -4.42% | -25.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.88% | 2.44% | +13.44% |
Volatility
FLOW.AS vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison
Flow Traders BV (FLOW.AS) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) at 4.60%. This indicates that FLOW.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLOW.AS | URTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 4.60% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.80% | 9.43% | +7.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.89% | 19.09% | +14.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.93% | 15.35% | +15.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.55% | 17.28% | +14.27% |