PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TLT vs. ASML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TLT vs. ASML

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, TLT returned -1.75%/yr vs 36.00%/yr for ASML. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

TLT vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLT achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 74.80% return. Over the past 10 years, TLT has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of -1.75%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 36.00% annualized return.

TLT

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.54%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.45%
1Y
2.88%
3Y*
-1.38%
5Y*
-6.53%
10Y*
-1.75%

ASML

1D
-1.89%
1M
17.83%
YTD
74.80%
6M
73.02%
1Y
138.89%
3Y*
37.59%
5Y*
22.97%
10Y*
36.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLT vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF		0.27%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%14.12%-1.61%9.18%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.		74.80%56.51%-7.70%39.91%-30.49%64.13%66.06%93.56%-9.80%56.23%

Correlation

The correlation between TLT and ASML is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2002

-0.17

The correlation between TLT and ASML shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF

ASML Holding N.V.

Often compared with TLT:
TLT vs. SPYTLT vs. IEFTLT vs. TMFTLT vs. BNDTLT vs. VGLTTLT vs. TLTWTLT vs. EDV
Often compared with ASML:
ASML vs. TSMASML vs. NVDAASML vs. ASM.ASASML vs. LRCXASML vs. ASML.ASASML vs. SOXXASML vs. AMAT

Return for Risk

TLT vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
ASML
ASML Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLT vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TLTASMLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.30
3.27

-2.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.50
3.70

-3.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.45

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

7.83

-7.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.92

21.08

-20.16

TLT vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLT and ASML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLT vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLT drawdown since its inception was -48.35%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLT and ASML.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TLTASMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.35%

-90.00%

+41.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-17.85%

+10.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-45.38%

+26.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

-56.84%

+13.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

-56.84%

+8.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.12%

-1.89%

-38.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.84%

-28.12%

+14.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

6.63%

-3.49%

Volatility

TLT vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) is 2.83%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 17.27%. This indicates that TLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TLTASMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

17.27%

-14.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.64%

34.58%

-27.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.68%

42.75%

-33.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.85%

42.44%

-26.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

38.72%

-23.81%

Dividends

TLT vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

TLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than ASML's 0.47% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.		0.47%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF		4.56%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

TLT and ASML have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASML has higher volatility (17.27%) compared to TLT (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLT dropped -48.35% vs ASML's -90.00%.

ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLT and ASML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer