TLN vs. EAT
TLN (Talen Energy Corporation) and EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) are both stocks. TLN operates in Utilities - Independent Power Producers (Utilities), while EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past year, TLN returned 6.12% vs 22.75% for EAT. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TLN vs. EAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLN achieves a -3.99% return, which is significantly lower than EAT's 30.28% return.
TLN
- 1D
- -5.11%
- 1M
- -11.33%
- 6M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- -3.99%
- 1Y
- 6.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 70.77%
EAT
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 10.07%
- 6M
- 14.87%
- YTD
- 30.28%
- 1Y
- 22.75%
- 3Y*
- 70.46%
- 5Y*
- 26.98%
- 10Y*
- 16.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $195.59M | $197.14M | $174.31M | |
| $226.85M | $284.31M | $304.32M |
TLN vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TLN Talen Energy Corporation | -3.99% | 86.05% | 66.50% |
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 30.28% | 8.49% | 99.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLN and EAT is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2024 | 0.28 |
The correlation between TLN and EAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TLN:
$16.34B
EAT:
$8.02B
TLN:
-$0.44
EAT:
$10.20
TLN:
5.68
EAT:
1.48
TLN:
15.91
EAT:
20.49
TLN:
$3.02B
EAT:
$5.73B
TLN:
$1.06B
EAT:
$3.45B
TLN:
$326.00M
EAT:
$807.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLN vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank
TLN
EAT
TLN vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLN | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.12 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 0.60 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.37 | 1.46 | -1.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLN vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLN drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, smaller than the maximum EAT drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLN and EAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLN | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -88.40% | +54.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.05% | -38.34% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -45.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -84.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.28% | -4.12% | -15.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.86% | -24.28% | +13.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.48% | 15.63% | +0.85% |
Volatility
TLN vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison
Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) has a higher volatility of 15.74% compared to Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) at 10.35%. This indicates that TLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLN | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.74% | 10.35% | +5.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.19% | 35.97% | +4.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.56% | 47.72% | +4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.89% | 48.84% | +11.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.89% | 55.24% | +4.65% |
Dividends
TLN vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison
Neither TLN nor EAT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
TLN Talen Energy Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TLN vs. EAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Talen Energy Corporation and Brinker International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TLN vs. EAT - Profitability Comparison
TLN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Talen Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
EAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
TLN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Talen Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 210.00M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
EAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
TLN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Talen Energy Corporation reported a net income of 63.00M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.
EAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TLN and EAT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLN has higher volatility (15.74%) compared to EAT (10.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLN dropped -33.80% vs EAT's -88.40%.
EAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLN and EAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer