TLHIX vs. FFGZX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX).
TLHIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009. FFGZX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2009.
Performance
TLHIX vs. FFGZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TLHIX vs. FFGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLHIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund | -1.08% | 15.76% | 10.59% | 15.54% | -15.72% | 11.65% | 14.76% | 21.35% | -5.07% | 14.88% |
FFGZX Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class | 0.03% | 9.13% | 5.02% | 8.32% | -11.07% | 2.85% | 8.59% | 10.68% | -0.80% | 6.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLHIX achieves a -1.08% return, which is significantly lower than FFGZX's 0.03% return. Over the past 10 years, TLHIX has outperformed FFGZX with an annualized return of 8.33%, while FFGZX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.95% annualized return.
TLHIX
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -3.88%
- YTD
- -1.08%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 13.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
FFGZX
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 7.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.23%
- 5Y*
- 2.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TLHIX vs. FFGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLHIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGZX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TLHIX vs. FFGZX — Risk / Return Rank
TLHIX
FFGZX
TLHIX vs. FFGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLHIX | FFGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 1.65 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 2.33 | -0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.33 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 2.23 | -0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 9.26 | -1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLHIX | FFGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 1.65 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.54 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.90 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.86 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between TLHIX and FFGZX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TLHIX vs. FFGZX - Dividend Comparison
TLHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than FFGZX's 3.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLHIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund | 4.25% | 4.20% | 3.62% | 2.44% | 2.82% | 3.21% | 2.06% | 2.25% | 2.68% | 0.14% | 2.49% | 0.25% |
FFGZX Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class | 3.43% | 3.30% | 3.18% | 2.88% | 3.11% | 2.10% | 2.22% | 7.35% | 3.00% | 1.95% | 1.56% | 1.06% |
Drawdowns
TLHIX vs. FFGZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLHIX drawdown since its inception was -23.86%, which is greater than FFGZX's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLHIX and FFGZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLHIX | FFGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.86% | -14.94% | -8.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.32% | -3.33% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.15% | -14.94% | -7.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.86% | -14.94% | -8.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.53% | -2.30% | -2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -2.29% | -1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 0.80% | +0.84% |
Volatility
TLHIX vs. FFGZX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) at 2.06%. This indicates that TLHIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TLHIX | FFGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 2.06% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.93% | 2.89% | +3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.06% | 4.42% | +5.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.22% | 5.04% | +5.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.08% | 4.39% | +6.69% |