TLG vs. SPYG
TLG (Touchstone Large Company Growth ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Touchstone, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. TLG is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TLG charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
TLG vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TLG
- 1D
- 2.60%
- 1M
- 6.83%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- 6M
- 16.02%
- YTD
- 15.11%
- 1Y
- 24.92%
- 3Y*
- 26.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.02%
- 10Y*
- 17.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $388.75M | $302.17M | $318.70M | |
| $169.84K | $227.64K | $177.78K |
TLG vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TLG Touchstone Large Company Growth ETF | 14.33% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 21.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLG and SPYG is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLG vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
TLG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPYG
TLG vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Large Company Growth ETF (TLG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLG | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.60 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLG vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLG drawdown since its inception was -11.79%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLG and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLG | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.79% | -67.63% | +55.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | 0.00% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.74% | -24.19% | +20.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.78% | — |
Volatility
TLG vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLG | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.19% | 18.33% | +5.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.19% | 21.56% | +2.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.19% | 20.82% | +3.37% |
TLG vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLG has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLG vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
TLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
TLG Touchstone Large Company Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, TLG and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for TLG.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for TLG.
TLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for TLG and 0.04% for SPYG.
Find the right allocation for TLG and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer