PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRG vs. SO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NRG vs. SO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) and The Southern Company (SO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRG achieves a -13.02% return, which is significantly lower than SO's 11.11% return. Over the past 10 years, NRG has outperformed SO with an annualized return of 28.30%, while SO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.91% annualized return.


NRG

1D
-0.90%
1M
0.01%
YTD
-13.02%
6M
-12.39%
1Y
-8.43%
3Y*
61.61%
5Y*
33.25%
10Y*
28.30%

SO

1D
1.61%
1M
0.84%
YTD
11.11%
6M
12.15%
1Y
8.59%
3Y*
14.57%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRG vs. SO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
-13.02%78.91%78.58%69.36%-23.47%18.54%-2.14%0.69%39.59%133.69%
SO
The Southern Company
11.11%9.47%21.72%2.21%8.24%16.34%0.63%51.65%-3.75%2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between NRG and SO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2003

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between NRG and SO has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NRG:

$28.63B

SO:

$107.08B

EPS

NRG:

$1.21

SO:

$3.92

PE Ratio

NRG:

113.67

SO:

24.22

PEG Ratio

NRG:

1.71

SO:

1.50

PS Ratio

NRG:

0.84

SO:

3.50

PB Ratio

NRG:

6.78

SO:

2.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

NRG:

$32.38B

SO:

$30.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NRG:

$4.69B

SO:

$13.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

NRG:

$2.57B

SO:

$14.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRG vs. SO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRG
NRG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
NRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
NRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SO
SO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRG vs. SO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) and The Southern Company (SO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NRGSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.10

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.25

0.58

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.59

1.34

-1.93

NRG vs. SO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRG Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the SO Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRG and SO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NRG vs. SO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRG drawdown since its inception was -79.41%, which is greater than SO's maximum drawdown of -38.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRG and SO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRGSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.41%

-38.43%

-40.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.24%

-14.99%

-19.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.24%

-14.99%

-19.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.24%

-23.28%

-10.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.76%

-38.43%

-10.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.97%

-3.00%

-21.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.99%

-6.87%

-21.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.34%

6.42%

+7.92%

Volatility

NRG vs. SO - Volatility Comparison

NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) has a higher volatility of 12.28% compared to The Southern Company (SO) at 6.03%. This indicates that NRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRGSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.28%

6.03%

+6.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.27%

13.11%

+21.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.16%

16.29%

+28.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.00%

18.62%

+21.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.15%

21.99%

+17.16%

Dividends

NRG vs. SO - Dividend Comparison

NRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than SO's 3.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
1.33%1.11%1.81%2.92%4.40%3.02%3.20%0.30%0.30%0.42%1.92%4.93%
SO
The Southern Company
3.57%3.37%3.47%3.96%3.78%3.82%4.13%3.86%5.42%4.78%4.52%4.60%

Financials

NRG vs. SO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NRG Energy, Inc. and The Southern Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
10.26B
8.40B
(NRG) Total Revenue
(SO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NRG vs. SO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NRG Energy, Inc. and The Southern Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
46.5%
Portfolio components
NRG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NRG Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 10.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Southern Company reported a gross profit of 3.90B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.5%.

NRG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NRG Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 328.00M and revenue of 10.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

SO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Southern Company reported an operating income of 2.02B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

NRG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NRG Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 125.00M and revenue of 10.26B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.

SO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Southern Company reported a net income of 1.36B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NRG and SO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRG has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to SO (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRG dropped -79.41% vs SO's -38.43%.

SO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRG and SO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer