MATX vs. ZIM
MATX (Matson, Inc.) and ZIM (ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Marine Shipping industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, MATX returned 27.24%/yr vs 18.83%/yr for ZIM. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MATX vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MATX achieves a 59.98% return, which is significantly higher than ZIM's 23.05% return.
MATX
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 8.24%
- YTD
- 59.98%
- 6M
- 60.54%
- 1Y
- 81.08%
- 3Y*
- 40.11%
- 5Y*
- 27.24%
- 10Y*
- 21.65%
ZIM
- 1D
- 3.82%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 23.05%
- 6M
- 31.40%
- 1Y
- 61.18%
- 3Y*
- 52.37%
- 5Y*
- 18.83%
- 10Y*
- —
MATX vs. ZIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MATX Matson, Inc. | 59.98% | -7.21% | 24.30% | 78.20% | -29.53% | 41.54% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 23.05% | 28.11% | 176.93% | -21.06% | -52.70% | 463.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between MATX and ZIM is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021 | 0.41 |
Fundamentals
MATX:
$6.02B
ZIM:
$3.04B
MATX:
$13.63
ZIM:
$0.81
MATX:
14.44
ZIM:
31.10
MATX:
2.41
ZIM:
0.18
MATX:
1.87
ZIM:
0.48
MATX:
2.21
ZIM:
0.80
MATX:
$3.32B
ZIM:
$6.29B
MATX:
$610.50M
ZIM:
$676.00M
MATX:
$712.90M
ZIM:
$1.73B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MATX vs. ZIM — Risk / Return Rank
MATX
ZIM
MATX vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matson, Inc. (MATX) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MATX | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.26 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 2.06 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.47 | 5.18 | +5.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MATX vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MATX drawdown since its inception was -71.40%, smaller than the maximum ZIM drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATX and ZIM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MATX | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.40% | -84.68% | +13.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.05% | -29.84% | +5.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.90% | -57.12% | +10.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.63% | -84.68% | +31.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -11.49% | +8.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.30% | -39.77% | +6.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.77% | 11.85% | -4.08% |
Volatility
MATX vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Matson, Inc. (MATX) is 8.68%, while ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a volatility of 11.94%. This indicates that MATX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MATX | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.68% | 11.94% | -3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.96% | 36.70% | -11.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.43% | 52.54% | -16.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.76% | 65.74% | -25.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.23% | 67.49% | -25.26% |
Dividends
MATX vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison
MATX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than ZIM's 4.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MATX Matson, Inc. | 0.73% | 1.13% | 0.98% | 1.15% | 1.95% | 1.18% | 1.58% | 2.11% | 2.56% | 2.61% | 2.09% | 1.64% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 4.95% | 20.16% | 22.40% | 64.84% | 160.27% | 7.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MATX vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Matson, Inc. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MATX vs. ZIM - Profitability Comparison
MATX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matson, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 757.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ZIM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 46.80M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.4%.
MATX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matson, Inc. reported an operating income of 61.40M and revenue of 757.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
ZIM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of -39.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.
MATX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matson, Inc. reported a net income of 56.60M and revenue of 757.80M, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.
ZIM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of -6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MATX and ZIM have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZIM has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to MATX (8.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MATX dropped -71.40% vs ZIM's -84.68%.
MATX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MATX and ZIM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer