MATX vs. DAC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MATX (Matson, Inc.) and DAC (Danaos Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Marine Shipping industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, MATX returned 21.00%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for DAC. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MATX vs. DAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matson, Inc. (MATX) and Danaos Corporation (DAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MATX achieves a 51.02% return, which is significantly higher than DAC's 38.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MATX has outperformed DAC with an annualized return of 21.00%, while DAC has yielded a comparatively lower 12.39% annualized return.

MATX

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 8.98%
• YTD: 51.02%
• 6M: 63.44%
• 1Y: 65.56%
• 3Y*: 38.38%
• 5Y*: 25.84%
• 10Y*: 21.00%

DAC

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 4.79%
• YTD: 38.38%
• 6M: 32.28%
• 1Y: 57.63%
• 3Y*: 33.16%
• 5Y*: 20.11%
• 10Y*: 12.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MATX vs. DAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MATX Matson, Inc.	51.02%	-7.21%	24.30%	78.20%	-29.53%	60.35%	43.05%	30.32%	9.78%	-13.51%
DAC Danaos Corporation	38.38%	22.24%	12.41%	47.51%	-26.57%	256.10%	133.44%	-12.57%	-48.28%	-45.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MATX and DAC is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2006	0.28

The correlation between MATX and DAC shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap MATX : $5.69B DAC : $2.34B
EPS MATX : $13.63 DAC : $28.34
PE Ratio MATX : 13.63 DAC : 4.53
PS Ratio MATX : 1.76 DAC : 2.26
PB Ratio MATX : 2.08 DAC : 0.60
Total Revenue (TTM) MATX : $3.32B DAC : $1.04B
Gross Profit (TTM) MATX : $610.50M DAC : $705.76M
EBITDA (TTM) MATX : $712.90M DAC : $739.01M

Return for Risk

MATX vs. DAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MATX

MATX Risk / Return Rank: 83
MATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
MATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
MATX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
MATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MATX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

DAC

DAC Risk / Return Rank: 91
DAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
DAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DAC Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
DAC Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MATX vs. DAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matson, Inc. (MATX) and Danaos Corporation (DAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MATX	DAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	2.71	-0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	3.66	-0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.43	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	4.61	-1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.45	14.74	-6.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MATX vs. DAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MATX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the DAC Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MATX and DAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MATX	DAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	2.71	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.58	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.19	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	-0.03	+0.29

Drawdowns

MATX vs. DAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MATX drawdown since its inception was -71.40%, smaller than the maximum DAC drawdown of -99.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATX and DAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MATX	DAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.40%	-99.42%	+28.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.05%	-12.58%	-11.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.90%	-28.87%	-18.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.63%	-50.14%	-3.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.63%	-95.81%	+42.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-67.11%	+65.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.33%	-80.47%	+47.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.78%	3.92%	+3.86%

Volatility

MATX vs. DAC - Volatility Comparison

Matson, Inc. (MATX) has a higher volatility of 12.96% compared to Danaos Corporation (DAC) at 7.26%. This indicates that MATX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MATX	DAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.96%	7.26%	+5.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.89%	16.62%	+8.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.00%	21.45%	+14.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.74%	34.65%	+5.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.19%	65.05%	-22.86%

Dividends

MATX vs. DAC - Dividend Comparison

MATX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than DAC's 2.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DAC Danaos Corporation	2.77%	3.66%	4.06%	4.12%	5.70%	2.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MATX Matson, Inc.	0.77%	1.13%	0.98%	1.15%	1.95%	1.18%	1.58%	2.11%	2.56%	2.61%	2.09%	1.64%

Financials

MATX vs. DAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Matson, Inc. and Danaos Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MATX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matson, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 757.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a gross profit of 150.55M and revenue of 253.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.3%.

MATX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matson, Inc. reported an operating income of 61.40M and revenue of 757.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

DAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported an operating income of 125.20M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.

MATX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matson, Inc. reported a net income of 56.60M and revenue of 757.80M, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.

DAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a net income of 140.42M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in a net margin of 55.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MATX and DAC in my portfolio?

MATX and DAC have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MATX or DAC?

MATX has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to DAC (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MATX dropped -71.40% vs DAC's -99.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.