PortfoliosLab logo
MATX vs. DAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MATX and DAC is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MATX vs. DAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matson, Inc. (MATX) and Danaos Corporation (DAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MATX:

0.01

DAC:

0.18

Sortino Ratio

MATX:

0.36

DAC:

0.52

Omega Ratio

MATX:

1.05

DAC:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

MATX:

0.02

DAC:

0.08

Martin Ratio

MATX:

0.06

DAC:

0.47

Ulcer Index

MATX:

16.71%

DAC:

13.53%

Daily Std Dev

MATX:

44.11%

DAC:

29.98%

Max Drawdown

MATX:

-70.57%

DAC:

-99.42%

Current Drawdown

MATX:

-30.89%

DAC:

-78.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MATX:

$3.79B

DAC:

$1.60B

EPS

MATX:

$15.07

DAC:

$26.07

PE Ratio

MATX:

7.71

DAC:

3.28

PEG Ratio

MATX:

3.31

DAC:

0.52

PS Ratio

MATX:

1.09

DAC:

1.58

PB Ratio

MATX:

1.44

DAC:

0.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

MATX:

$3.48B

DAC:

$759.63M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MATX:

$1.53B

DAC:

$487.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

MATX:

$871.00M

DAC:

$494.84M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MATX achieves a -14.21% return, which is significantly lower than DAC's 9.21% return. Over the past 10 years, MATX has outperformed DAC with an annualized return of 12.48%, while DAC has yielded a comparatively lower 1.30% annualized return.


MATX

YTD

-14.21%

1M

17.84%

6M

-28.00%

1Y

0.64%

5Y*

37.86%

10Y*

12.48%

DAC

YTD

9.21%

1M

13.86%

6M

2.99%

1Y

5.41%

5Y*

93.10%

10Y*

1.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MATX vs. DAC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MATX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MATX is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MATX is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MATX is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MATX is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MATX is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MATX is 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DAC is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DAC is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DAC is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DAC is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DAC is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DAC is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MATX vs. DAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matson, Inc. (MATX) and Danaos Corporation (DAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MATX Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the DAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MATX and DAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MATX vs. DAC - Dividend Comparison

MATX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than DAC's 3.81% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MATX
Matson, Inc.
1.18%0.98%1.15%1.95%1.18%1.58%2.11%2.56%2.61%2.09%1.64%1.91%
DAC
Danaos Corporation
3.81%4.06%4.12%5.70%2.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MATX vs. DAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MATX drawdown since its inception was -70.57%, smaller than the maximum DAC drawdown of -99.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATX and DAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MATX vs. DAC - Volatility Comparison

Matson, Inc. (MATX) has a higher volatility of 26.97% compared to Danaos Corporation (DAC) at 9.06%. This indicates that MATX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MATX vs. DAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Matson, Inc. and Danaos Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20212022202320242025
782.00M
258.18M
(MATX) Total Revenue
(DAC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MATX vs. DAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Matson, Inc. and Danaos Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
61.2%
(MATX) Gross Margin
(DAC) Gross Margin
MATX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Matson, Inc. reported a gross profit of 782.00M and revenue of 782.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

DAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Danaos Corporation reported a gross profit of 158.07M and revenue of 258.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.

MATX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Matson, Inc. reported an operating income of 82.10M and revenue of 782.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.

DAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Danaos Corporation reported an operating income of 128.79M and revenue of 258.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.9%.

MATX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Matson, Inc. reported a net income of 72.30M and revenue of 782.00M, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.

DAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Danaos Corporation reported a net income of 90.43M and revenue of 258.18M, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.