PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIPB vs. VTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIPB vs. VTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIPB achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly higher than VTP's 0.49% return.


TIPB

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.15%
6M
0.74%
YTD
1.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

VTP

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.92%
6M
0.06%
YTD
0.49%
1Y
1.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.11K$9.22K$33.66K
$3.99M$3.36M$2.41M

TIPB vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TIPB and VTP is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.92

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIPB vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TIPB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


VTP
VTP Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
VTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTP Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
VTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTP Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TIPB vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIPBVTPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.51

TIPB vs. VTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIPB vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIPB drawdown since its inception was -1.32%, smaller than the maximum VTP drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPB and VTP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIPBVTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-1.92%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-1.34%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-0.56%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

Volatility

TIPB vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIPBVTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60%

3.28%

-0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.60%

3.31%

-0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.60%

3.31%

-0.71%

TIPB vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIPB has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TIPB vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison

TIPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than VTP's 2.99% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, TIPB and VTP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for TIPB.

TIPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 2.99% for VTP.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TIPB and 0.05% for VTP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIPB and VTP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer