PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TIPB vs. IBIH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TIPB vs. IBIH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TIPB (Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF) and IBIH (iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. TIPB is actively managed, while IBIH is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure.

Performance

TIPB vs. IBIH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB) and iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIPB achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly higher than IBIH's 0.76% return.

TIPB

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
1.03%
6M
1.14%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

IBIH

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
0.76%
6M
0.94%
1Y
3.67%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIPB vs. IBIH - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
TIPB
Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF		1.03%0.79%
IBIH
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF		0.76%1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between TIPB and IBIH is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF

iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF

Often compared with TIPB:
TIPB vs. IBIITIPB vs. ESGTIPB vs. IBICTIPB vs. CPIITIPB vs. DRLLTIPB vs. IBIDTIPB vs. EVLN
Often compared with IBIH:
IBIH vs. IBIIIBIH vs. WIPIBIH vs. IBICIBIH vs. IBIDIBIH vs. JCPIIBIH vs. CPIIIBIH vs. VTIP

Return for Risk

TIPB vs. IBIH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TIPB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBIH
IBIH Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IBIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIH Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIH Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIPB vs. IBIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB) and iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TIPBIBIHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

1.14

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

1.71

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.21

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

2.17

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

6.69

—

TIPB vs. IBIH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIPB vs. IBIH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIPB drawdown since its inception was -1.32%, smaller than the maximum IBIH drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPB and IBIH.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TIPBIBIHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-3.94%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-1.70%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-1.45%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.38%

-0.96%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

0.55%

—

Volatility

TIPB vs. IBIH - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TIPBIBIHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

1.34%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

2.34%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65%

3.23%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.65%

4.94%

-2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.65%

4.94%

-2.29%

Dividends

TIPB vs. IBIH - Dividend Comparison

TIPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than IBIH's 3.93% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023
IBIH
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF		3.93%4.68%4.34%0.70%
TIPB
Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF		3.04%1.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.94, TIPB and IBIH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IBIH has the higher dividend yield at 3.93%, compared with 3.04% for TIPB.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIPB and IBIH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer