TIPB vs. IBIH
TIPB (Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF) and IBIH (iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. TIPB is actively managed, while IBIH is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
TIPB vs. IBIH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIPB achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly higher than IBIH's 1.04% return.
TIPB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IBIH
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 1Y
- 2.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $435.14K | $428.04K | $430.49K | |
| $2.11K | $9.22K | $33.66K |
TIPB vs. IBIH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIPB Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 1.32% | 0.79% |
IBIH iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF | 1.04% | 1.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIPB and IBIH is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIPB vs. IBIH — Risk / Return Rank
TIPB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBIH
TIPB vs. IBIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB) and iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIPB | IBIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIPB vs. IBIH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIPB drawdown since its inception was -1.32%, smaller than the maximum IBIH drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPB and IBIH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIPB | IBIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -3.94% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -1.17% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -0.96% | +0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.64% | — |
Volatility
TIPB vs. IBIH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIPB | IBIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60% | 3.14% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.60% | 4.87% | -2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.60% | 4.87% | -2.27% |
TIPB vs. IBIH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TIPB and IBIH have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TIPB vs. IBIH - Dividend Comparison
TIPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than IBIH's 4.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIH iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF | 4.98% | 4.68% | 4.34% | 0.70% |
TIPB Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 4.16% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, TIPB and IBIH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TIPB and IBIH have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
IBIH has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 4.16% for TIPB.
They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares.
Find the right allocation for TIPB and IBIH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer