TIPB vs. FCUS
TIPB (Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF) and FCUS (Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TIPB is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Northern Trust, while FCUS is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Pinnacle. Both are actively managed. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TIPB charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FCUS.
Performance
TIPB vs. FCUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIPB achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than FCUS's 14.79% return.
TIPB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FCUS
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -9.18%
- 6M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 14.79%
- 1Y
- 40.13%
- 3Y*
- 22.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $898.65K | $963.67K | $1.11M | |
| $2.11K | $9.22K | $33.66K |
TIPB vs. FCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIPB Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 1.32% | 0.79% |
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 14.79% | 18.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIPB and FCUS is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIPB vs. FCUS — Risk / Return Rank
TIPB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FCUS
TIPB vs. FCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIPB | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.18 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIPB vs. FCUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIPB drawdown since its inception was -1.32%, smaller than the maximum FCUS drawdown of -39.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPB and FCUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIPB | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -39.89% | +38.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -31.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -23.51% | +22.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -7.79% | +7.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.88% | — |
Volatility
TIPB vs. FCUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIPB | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60% | 41.62% | -39.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.60% | 32.09% | -29.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.60% | 32.09% | -29.49% |
TIPB vs. FCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIPB has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FCUS's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIPB vs. FCUS - Dividend Comparison
TIPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than FCUS's 3.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 3.77% | 4.33% | 11.19% |
TIPB Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 4.16% | 1.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIPB and FCUS have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TIPB is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TIPB is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FCUS.
TIPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 3.77% for FCUS.
TIPB is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while FCUS is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Pinnacle. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TIPB and 0.79% for FCUS.
Find the right allocation for TIPB and FCUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer