PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIPB vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIPB vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIPB achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.69% return.


TIPB

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.15%
6M
0.74%
YTD
1.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

IBIC

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.23%
6M
2.39%
YTD
2.69%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.04M$835.24K$534.47K
$2.11K$9.22K$33.66K

TIPB vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TIPB and IBIC is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIPB vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TIPB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TIPB vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIPBIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

54.88

TIPB vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIPB vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIPB drawdown since its inception was -1.32%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPB and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIPBIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-0.90%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-0.06%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-0.10%

-0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

Volatility

TIPB vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIPBIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60%

0.89%

+1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.60%

1.54%

+1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.60%

1.54%

+1.06%

TIPB vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TIPB and IBIC have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TIPB vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

TIPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than IBIC's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
4.62%4.43%4.65%0.83%
TIPB
Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF
4.16%1.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIPB and IBIC have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TIPB and IBIC have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 4.16% for TIPB.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIPB and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer