PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIPB vs. RLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIPB vs. RLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB) and State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIPB achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than RLY's 15.77% return.


TIPB

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.15%
6M
0.74%
YTD
1.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

RLY

1D
-0.46%
1M
4.07%
6M
7.44%
YTD
15.77%
1Y
27.64%
3Y*
12.72%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
8.27%
ALL TIME*
4.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.60M$7.84M$7.75M
$2.11K$9.22K$33.66K

TIPB vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TIPB and RLY is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIPB vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TIPB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


RLY
RLY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TIPB vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB) and State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIPBRLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.77

TIPB vs. RLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIPB vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIPB drawdown since its inception was -1.32%, smaller than the maximum RLY drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPB and RLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIPBRLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-37.75%

+36.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-2.74%

+1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-9.40%

+8.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

Volatility

TIPB vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIPBRLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60%

10.60%

-8.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.60%

13.46%

-10.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.60%

13.80%

-11.20%

TIPB vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIPB has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIPB vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison

TIPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than RLY's 3.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RLY
State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
3.06%3.24%3.31%3.71%5.66%12.15%2.16%3.45%2.76%1.85%2.07%1.80%
TIPB
Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF
4.16%1.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIPB and RLY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TIPB is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TIPB is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.

TIPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 3.06% for RLY.

TIPB is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while RLY is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TIPB and 0.50% for RLY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIPB and RLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer